Skip to main content
Kent Academic Repository

For assessing researcher development but against grading the PhD in a framework of phonocentric and grammatocentric tensions: a response to Gill Clarke and Janet Bohrer

Gough, A.Martin (2010) For assessing researcher development but against grading the PhD in a framework of phonocentric and grammatocentric tensions: a response to Gill Clarke and Janet Bohrer. In: A Debate: Assessment, Accreditation and the Elusive Notion of ‘Doctorateness’, 24 May 2010, SRHE Offices, London. (Unpublished) (KAR id:25160)

Item Type: Conference or workshop item (Speech)
Projects: Evaluation of researcher support programmes: assessment within development events, and the attitudes and experiences towards academic careers provision, of early career academics (ECAs)
Subjects: L Education > LA History of education
L Education > LC Special aspects of education > LC5201 Education extension. Adult education. Continuing education
L Education > LB Theory and practice of education > LB2300 Higher Education
B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > BD Speculative Philosophy
Divisions: Divisions > Directorate of Education > Centre for the Study of Higher Education
Funders: Society for Research into Higher Education (https://ror.org/02ns75z54)
Depositing User: Martin Gough
Date Deposited: 26 Oct 2010 14:22 UTC
Last Modified: 12 Jul 2022 10:40 UTC
Resource URI: https://kar.kent.ac.uk/id/eprint/25160 (The current URI for this page, for reference purposes)

University of Kent Author Information

Gough, A.Martin.

Creator's ORCID:
CReDIT Contributor Roles:
  • Depositors only (login required):

Total unique views for this document in KAR since July 2020. For more details click on the image.