Skip to main content

Challenging Partial Intentionalism

Maes, Hans R.V. (2008) Challenging Partial Intentionalism. Journal of Visual Art Practice, 7 (1). pp. 85-94. ISSN 1470-2029. (doi:10.1386/jvap.7.1.85_1) (KAR id:31436)

Language: English
Download (137kB) Preview
[thumbnail of Maes Challenging Partial Intentionalism.pdf]
This file may not be suitable for users of assistive technology.
Request an accessible format
Official URL


Paisley Livingston claims that an artist’s intentions are successfully realized and hence determinate of the meaning of a work if and only if they are compatible and “mesh” with the linguistic and conventional meanings of the text or artefact taken in its target or intended context. I argue that this specific standard of success is not without its difficulties. First, I show how an artist’s intention can sometimes be constitutive of a work’s meaning even if there is no significant meshing between the artist’s intention and his work. Second, I argue against the claim that the artist’s intentions need to be compatible with the linguistic and conventional meanings of a text. Third, I discuss a case that creates a particular puzzle for Livingston since the intentions of the artist concerned are clearly not successfully realized, though they are compatible and mesh with all the relevant data. I conclude my paper by suggesting a solution to this puzzle.

Item Type: Article
DOI/Identification number: 10.1386/jvap.7.1.85_1
Uncontrolled keywords: intention; interpretation; art; intentionalism
Subjects: B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > BH Aesthetics
N Visual Arts > NX Arts in general
Divisions: Divisions > Division of Arts and Humanities > School of Arts
Depositing User: Hans Maes
Date Deposited: 09 Oct 2012 13:00 UTC
Last Modified: 16 Feb 2021 12:42 UTC
Resource URI: (The current URI for this page, for reference purposes)
Maes, Hans R.V.:
  • Depositors only (login required):