Tang, Xiaofei, Luo, Yong (Eddie), Zhou, Pan, Lowe, Ben (2023) Regulating sharing platforms in lateral exchange markets: The role of power and trust. European Journal of Marketing, 57 (4). pp. 1014-1036. ISSN 0309-0566. (doi:10.1108/EJM-06-2021-0432) (KAR id:99909)
PDF
Author's Accepted Manuscript
Language: English
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
|
|
Download this file (PDF/784kB) |
Preview |
Request a format suitable for use with assistive technology e.g. a screenreader | |
Official URL: https://doi.org/10.1108/EJM-06-2021-0432 |
Abstract
This research aims to examine different types of sharing platforms based on risk perceptions of product/service providers and users, and to illustrate appropriate platform regulation preferences.
A survey was used (N=540) to collect data on platform participants’ risk perceptions and regulation preferences in the Chinese (N=263) and the US markets (N=277). Cluster analysis and multiple correspondence analysis were used to categorise platforms and match their regulation preferences with the risk characteristics.
The results show that i) four types of sharing platforms are categorised in terms of the risk perceived by the supply and demand side, and ii) four types of regulation preferences are clustered, drawing on the power and trust elements proposed from the slippery slope framework. Further, coercive power regulation is favoured by participants of platforms with high supply risk and low demand risk, legitimate power regulation is preferred by actors of platforms with low supply risk and high demand risk, reason-based trust regulation is preferred by actors of platforms with high supply and demand risk, and implicit trust regulation is favoured by participants of platforms with low supply and demand risk.
This paper develops an empirical typology of platforms based on risk perceptions of providers and users, and advances our understanding about lateral exchange markets from a consumer perspective.
This paper provides implications for platforms to regulate transactions through two mechanisms – the power of platforms and trust in platform participants.
Regulating by power ensures transaction security while regulating by trust enhances transaction efficiency, so it is important to configure the power and trust elements in platform regulation in an appropriate manner. This paper is one of the first attempts at addressing platform regulation and shows how consumers’ risk perception of platforms can lead to important implications for theory and practice in marketing and better regulation of platform transactions.
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
DOI/Identification number: | 10.1108/EJM-06-2021-0432 |
Additional information: | This author accepted manuscript is deposited under a Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC) licence. This means that anyone may distribute, adapt, and build upon the work for non-commercial purposes, subject to full attribution. If you wish to use this manuscript for commercial purposes, please contact permissions@emerald.com. |
Uncontrolled keywords: | Risk perception, trust, power, sharing platform, sharing economy |
Subjects: |
H Social Sciences H Social Sciences > HF Commerce H Social Sciences > HF Commerce > HF5351 Business H Social Sciences > HF Commerce > HF5415 Marketing |
Divisions: | Divisions > Kent Business School - Division > Department of Marketing, Entrepreneurship and International Business |
Funders: | University of Kent (https://ror.org/00xkeyj56) |
Depositing User: | Benjamin Lowe |
Date Deposited: | 06 Feb 2023 04:41 UTC |
Last Modified: | 04 Jul 2023 13:20 UTC |
Resource URI: | https://kar.kent.ac.uk/id/eprint/99909 (The current URI for this page, for reference purposes) |
- Link to SensusAccess
- Export to:
- RefWorks
- EPrints3 XML
- BibTeX
- CSV
- Depositors only (login required):