Skip to main content
Kent Academic Repository

Communication intervention for people with profound intellectual and multiple disabilities: implications from a systematic review

Goldbart, Juliet, Ware, Jean, Chadwick, Darren, Buell, Susan, Bradshaw, Jill (2021) Communication intervention for people with profound intellectual and multiple disabilities: implications from a systematic review. In: Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities. 34 (5). p. 167. Wiley (The full text of this publication is not currently available from this repository. You may be able to access a copy if URLs are provided) (KAR id:91806)

The full text of this publication is not currently available from this repository. You may be able to access a copy if URLs are provided. (Contact us about this Publication)
Official URL:
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jar.12...

Abstract

Background: Communication is a human right. Children and adults withprofound intellectual and multiple disabilities experience profounddevelopmental delay, and communication, mobility and sensory difficul-ties, restricting their access to this basic right. A range of communica-tion interventions is available to increase interaction and participation,but there is limited high-quality supporting evidence. The aim of thispaper is, through a systematic review, to identify evidence-based com-munication interventions for practitioners and to inform the design offuture research.Methods: A systematic review was undertaken, conforming to PROS-PERO guidelines. Quality appraisal was conducted using Crowe's Criti-cal Appraisal Tool (CCAT). Findings are reported according to PRISMA.Results: Few good-quality evaluations of communication interventionwere found; however, some cautious recommendations can be madefor teaching and therapy. Challenges to research rigour include thediversity of children and adults with profound intellectual and multipledisabilities, small sample sizes and difficult decisions regarding whoshould intervene, assessment consistency, acceptable interventionintensity and the management of fidelity.Conclusions: Whilst further high-quality research is needed, someinterventions with either cognitive or interactive bases can be cau-tiously recommended. Researchers could consider greater use of sin-gle case experimental designs and the involvement of parents,teachers and therapists in delivering interventions

Item Type: Conference or workshop item (Paper)
Subjects: B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > BF Psychology
Divisions: Divisions > Division for the Study of Law, Society and Social Justice > School of Social Policy, Sociology and Social Research > Tizard
Depositing User: Jill Bradshaw
Date Deposited: 30 Nov 2021 15:05 UTC
Last Modified: 05 Nov 2024 12:57 UTC
Resource URI: https://kar.kent.ac.uk/id/eprint/91806 (The current URI for this page, for reference purposes)

University of Kent Author Information

  • Depositors only (login required):

Total unique views for this document in KAR since July 2020. For more details click on the image.