Goldbart, Juliet, Ware, Jean, Chadwick, Darren, Buell, Susan, Bradshaw, Jill (2021) Communication intervention for people with profound intellectual and multiple disabilities: implications from a systematic review. In: Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities. 34 (5). p. 167. Wiley (The full text of this publication is not currently available from this repository. You may be able to access a copy if URLs are provided) (KAR id:91806)
The full text of this publication is not currently available from this repository. You may be able to access a copy if URLs are provided. (Contact us about this Publication) | |
Official URL: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jar.12... |
Abstract
Background: Communication is a human right. Children and adults withprofound intellectual and multiple disabilities experience profounddevelopmental delay, and communication, mobility and sensory difficul-ties, restricting their access to this basic right. A range of communica-tion interventions is available to increase interaction and participation,but there is limited high-quality supporting evidence. The aim of thispaper is, through a systematic review, to identify evidence-based com-munication interventions for practitioners and to inform the design offuture research.Methods: A systematic review was undertaken, conforming to PROS-PERO guidelines. Quality appraisal was conducted using Crowe's Criti-cal Appraisal Tool (CCAT). Findings are reported according to PRISMA.Results: Few good-quality evaluations of communication interventionwere found; however, some cautious recommendations can be madefor teaching and therapy. Challenges to research rigour include thediversity of children and adults with profound intellectual and multipledisabilities, small sample sizes and difficult decisions regarding whoshould intervene, assessment consistency, acceptable interventionintensity and the management of fidelity.Conclusions: Whilst further high-quality research is needed, someinterventions with either cognitive or interactive bases can be cau-tiously recommended. Researchers could consider greater use of sin-gle case experimental designs and the involvement of parents,teachers and therapists in delivering interventions
Item Type: | Conference or workshop item (Paper) |
---|---|
Subjects: | B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > BF Psychology |
Divisions: | Divisions > Division for the Study of Law, Society and Social Justice > School of Social Policy, Sociology and Social Research > Tizard |
Depositing User: | Jill Bradshaw |
Date Deposited: | 30 Nov 2021 15:05 UTC |
Last Modified: | 05 Nov 2024 12:57 UTC |
Resource URI: | https://kar.kent.ac.uk/id/eprint/91806 (The current URI for this page, for reference purposes) |
- Export to:
- RefWorks
- EPrints3 XML
- BibTeX
- CSV
- Depositors only (login required):