Lewis, Nicole M., Rathje, Claudia Cattoni, Canedo-Ribeiro, Carla, Bosman, Lisa M., Kiazim, Lucas G., Jennings, Rebecca L., O’Connor, Rebecca E., Silvestri, Giuseppe, Griffin, Darren K. (2021) Incidence, Reproductive Outcome, and Economic Impact of Reciprocal Translocations in the Domestic Pig. DNA, 1 (2). pp. 68-76. ISSN 2673-8856. (doi:10.3390/dna1020007) (KAR id:90831)
PDF
Publisher pdf
Language: English
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
|
|
Download this file (PDF/578kB) |
Preview |
Request a format suitable for use with assistive technology e.g. a screenreader | |
Official URL: https://doi.org/10.3390/dna1020007 |
Abstract
Pigs (Sus scrofa) have vast economic importance, with pork accounting for over 30% of the global meat consumption. Chromosomal abnormalities, and in particular reciprocal translocations (RTs), are an important cause of hypoprolificacy (litter size reduction) in pigs. However, these do not necessarily present with a recognizable phenotype and may cause significant economic losses for breeders when undetected. Here, we present a reappraisal of the incidence of RTs across several European pig herds, using contemporary methodology, as well as an analysis modelling the economic impact of these abnormalities. Molecular cytogenetic investigation was completed by karyotyping and/or multiprobe FISH (fluorescence in situ hybridisation) between 2016–2021, testing 2673 animals. We identified 19 types of chromosome abnormalities, the prevalence of these errors in the database was 9.1%, and the estimated incidence of de novo errors was 0.90%. Financial modelling across different scenarios revealed the potential economic impact of an undetected RT, ranging from £69,802 for an individual affected terminal boar in a commercial farm selling weaned pigs, to £51,215,378 for a genetics company with an undetected RT in a dam line boar used in a nucleus farm. Moreover, the added benefits of screening by FISH instead of karyotyping were estimated, providing a strong case for proactive screening by this approach.
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
DOI/Identification number: | 10.3390/dna1020007 |
Uncontrolled keywords: | chromosome; karyotype; FISH; subtelomere; artificial insemination (AI) |
Subjects: |
Q Science > QH Natural history > QH301 Biology Q Science > QH Natural history > QH426 Genetics |
Divisions: |
Divisions > Division of Natural Sciences > Centre for Interdisciplinary Studies of Reproduction Divisions > Division of Natural Sciences > Biosciences |
Funders: | Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (https://ror.org/00cwqg982) |
Depositing User: | Giuseppe Silvestri |
Date Deposited: | 13 Oct 2021 09:47 UTC |
Last Modified: | 05 Nov 2024 12:56 UTC |
Resource URI: | https://kar.kent.ac.uk/id/eprint/90831 (The current URI for this page, for reference purposes) |
- Link to SensusAccess
- Export to:
- RefWorks
- EPrints3 XML
- BibTeX
- CSV
- Depositors only (login required):