Skip to main content
Kent Academic Repository

The firesetting offence chain for adults with intellectual and other developmental disabilities

Collins, Josephine, Barnoux, Magali F.L., Langdon, Peter E. (2021) The firesetting offence chain for adults with intellectual and other developmental disabilities. In: Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities. Proceedings of the 6th IASSIDD Europe Congress: Value Diversity. 34. pp. 1333-1334. Wiley (doi:10.1111/jar.12917) (Access to this publication is currently restricted. You may be able to access a copy if URLs are provided) (KAR id:89700)

Other (Powerpoint Presentation) Presentation
Language: English

Restricted to Repository staff only
Contact us about this Publication
[thumbnail of Powerpoint Presentation]
Official URL:
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jar.12917

Abstract

Background: The aims of the research are to: 1) validate Barnouxet al.'s (2015) and Tyler et al.'s (2014) micro-level theories of adult firesetting with a sample of adults with intellectual and developmental disabilities who have set fires; and 2) to offer a unified descriptive model of the offence chain for adults with intellectual and other developmental disabilities who set fires. Method: Thirteen adults in England with intellectual and other developmental disabilities were interviewed about the affective, cognitive, behavioural, and contextual factors leading up to and surrounding a recorded firesetting incident. Offence account interviews were analysed using a Grounded Theory approach. Results: The resulting model consists of four main phases: 1) background, 2) early adulthood, 3) pre-offence period, and 4) offence, and post-offence period. The model accounts for unique precursors to firesetting within this population, including mental health deterioration, poor problem solving and new motivations for firesetting. Conclusions: The theoretical model seeks to explain the contributing factors leading to a single incident of firesetting for adults with intellectual and other developmental disabilities. The findings provide researchers and practitioners with a useful resource to inform assessment and treatment practice, as well as a theoretical grounding in which to base future research.

Item Type: Conference or workshop item (Paper)
DOI/Identification number: 10.1111/jar.12917
Subjects: B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > BF Psychology
Divisions: Divisions > Division for the Study of Law, Society and Social Justice > School of Social Policy, Sociology and Social Research > Tizard
Depositing User: Magali Barnoux
Date Deposited: 10 Aug 2021 10:06 UTC
Last Modified: 05 Nov 2024 12:55 UTC
Resource URI: https://kar.kent.ac.uk/id/eprint/89700 (The current URI for this page, for reference purposes)

University of Kent Author Information

Collins, Josephine.

Creator's ORCID:
CReDIT Contributor Roles:

Barnoux, Magali F.L..

Creator's ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7921-8819
CReDIT Contributor Roles:
  • Depositors only (login required):

Total unique views for this document in KAR since July 2020. For more details click on the image.