Forrester, Michael A., Reason, David (2005) The means and ends of two styles of analysis. In: Conversation Analysis & Psychotherapy, July, 2005, Manchester. (Unpublished) (KAR id:75935)
PDF
Publisher pdf
Language: English |
|
Download this file (PDF/263kB) |
|
Request a format suitable for use with assistive technology e.g. a screenreader | |
Microsoft Word (This is a report of a paper given at a conference in Manchester on CA and psychotherapy.)
Presentation
Language: English |
|
Download this file (Microsoft Word/67kB) |
|
Request a format suitable for use with assistive technology e.g. a screenreader |
Abstract
Psychoanalytic psychotherapy has placed great emphasis on 'talk' with the analyst enjoined to attend to the fine detail of utterance. We explore the consequences of a tension between the injunction to a careful attention to the detail of speaking and the lack of a shared set of guidelines for the recording and representation of speech. We consider the possibility that standard conventions of CA transcription are inadequate to the task of representing psychoanalytic talk in a way which could ground an understanding of the process of psychotherapy. The centrality of 'countertransference' emerges as key to the psychoanalytic mode of understanding psychotherapeutic interaction, a point we illustrate with examples.
Item Type: | Conference or workshop item (Paper) |
---|---|
Subjects: | B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > BF Psychology > BF41 Psychology and philosophy |
Divisions: | Divisions > Division of Human and Social Sciences > School of Psychology |
Depositing User: | Michael Forrester |
Date Deposited: | 21 Aug 2019 14:43 UTC |
Last Modified: | 16 Nov 2021 10:26 UTC |
Resource URI: | https://kar.kent.ac.uk/id/eprint/75935 (The current URI for this page, for reference purposes) |
- Link to SensusAccess
- Export to:
- RefWorks
- EPrints3 XML
- BibTeX
- CSV
- Depositors only (login required):