Smith, Murray (2018) Film, Art, and the Third Culture: A Response. Projections, 12 (2). pp. 111-136. ISSN 1934-9688. (doi:10.3167/proj.2018.120214) (KAR id:72057)
PDF
Author's Accepted Manuscript
Language: English |
|
Download this file (PDF/895kB) |
Preview |
Request a format suitable for use with assistive technology e.g. a screenreader | |
Official URL: https://doi.org/10.3167/proj.2018.120214 |
Abstract
In this article, I reply to the eleven commentaries on Film, Art, and the Third Culture gathered here, organizing my responses thematically and seeking to find points of similarity and difference among the commentators as well as with my own perspective. I address arguments on embodied simulation; the analogy between films and dreams; aesthetic experience and the “expansion” of ordinary experience; the relationships between culture and cognition and between fiction and emotion; theories of the extended mind and of niche construction; the place of neuroscience in aesthetics; and the relationship between naturalism and normativity. I conclude with some reflections on naturalistic methodology.
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
DOI/Identification number: | 10.3167/proj.2018.120214 |
Additional information: | Link to journal homepage for free access (University of Kent users only): https://www-berghahnjournals-com.chain.kent.ac.uk/view/journals/projections/projections-overview.xml |
Subjects: | P Language and Literature > PN Literature (General) > PN1993 Motion Pictures |
Divisions: | Divisions > Division of Arts and Humanities > School of Arts |
Depositing User: | Murray Smith |
Date Deposited: | 29 Jan 2019 10:05 UTC |
Last Modified: | 05 Nov 2024 12:34 UTC |
Resource URI: | https://kar.kent.ac.uk/id/eprint/72057 (The current URI for this page, for reference purposes) |
- Link to SensusAccess
- Export to:
- RefWorks
- EPrints3 XML
- BibTeX
- CSV
- Depositors only (login required):