Ismail, Mohamed, Hussein, Shereen, Stevens, Martin John, Manthorpe, Jill, Woolham, John Gordon, Baxter, Kate, Samsi, Kritika, Aspinal, Fiona (2017) Do Personal Budgets Increase the Risk of Abuse? Evidence from English National Data. Journal of Social Policy, 46 (2). pp. 291-311. ISSN 0047-2794. (doi:10.1017/S0047279416000623) (KAR id:68304)
PDF
Author's Accepted Manuscript
Language: English |
|
Download this file (PDF/878kB) |
|
Request a format suitable for use with assistive technology e.g. a screenreader | |
Official URL: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047279416000623 |
Abstract
With the continued implementation of the personalisation policy, Personal Budgets (PBs) have moved to the mainstream in adult social care in England. The relationship between the policy goals of personalisation and safeguarding is contentious. Some have argued that PBs have the potential to empower recipients, while others believe PBs, especially Direct Payments, might increase the risk of abuse. This paper provides empirical evidence about levels of uptake of PBs and safeguarding referrals in England based on in-depth analysis of national data at aggregate, local council level in England, covering 152 Councils. This is complemented by analysis of 2,209 individual referral records obtained from three purposively selected study sites. The aim is to explore whether available data could provide evidence of association between the uptake of PBs and safeguarding referrals. Analysis of the national dataset found no significant relationships between PB uptake and the level and type of alleged abuse. However, analysis of individual level referral data, from the three selected sites did find some significant associations particularly with financial abuse; and t the main perpetrators of the alleged abuse to be home care employees. The findings are discussed within the context of current policy and practice context.With the continued implementation of the personalisation policy, Personal Budgets (PBs) have moved to the mainstream in adult social care in England. The relationship between the policy goals of personalisation and safeguarding is contentious. Some have argued that PBs have the potential to empower recipients, while others believe PBs, especially Direct Payments, might increase the risk of abuse. This paper provides empirical evidence about levels of uptake of PBs and safeguarding referrals in England based on in-depth analysis of national data at aggregate, local council level in England, covering 152 Councils. This is complemented by analysis of 2,209 individual referral records obtained from three purposively selected study sites. The aim is to explore whether available data could provide evidence of association between the uptake of PBs and safeguarding referrals. Analysis of the national dataset found no significant relationships between PB uptake and the level and type of alleged abuse. However, analysis of individual level referral data, from the three selected sites did find some significant associations particularly with financial abuse; and t the main perpetrators of the alleged abuse to be home care employees. The findings are discussed within the context of current policy and practice context.
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
DOI/Identification number: | 10.1017/S0047279416000623 |
Additional information: | Unmapped bibliographic data: M3 - Article [Field not mapped to EPrints] U2 - 10.1017/S0047279416000623 [Field not mapped to EPrints] JO - Journal of Social Policy [Field not mapped to EPrints] |
Subjects: | H Social Sciences |
Divisions: |
Divisions > Division for the Study of Law, Society and Social Justice > School of Social Policy, Sociology and Social Research Divisions > Division for the Study of Law, Society and Social Justice > School of Social Policy, Sociology and Social Research > Personal Social Services Research Unit |
Depositing User: | Shereen Hussein |
Date Deposited: | 13 Nov 2018 11:49 UTC |
Last Modified: | 05 Nov 2024 12:29 UTC |
Resource URI: | https://kar.kent.ac.uk/id/eprint/68304 (The current URI for this page, for reference purposes) |
- Link to SensusAccess
- Export to:
- RefWorks
- EPrints3 XML
- BibTeX
- CSV
- Depositors only (login required):