Tapp, James, Cottle, Louise, Christmas, Michelle, Stratton, Rose, Gannon, Theresa A., Moore, Estelle (2017) A psychometric evaluation of the Defence Style Questionnaire-40 in a UK forensic patient population. The Journal of Forensic Psychiatry & Psychology, 29 (2). pp. 288-307. ISSN 1478-9949. (doi:10.1080/14789949.2017.1375542) (KAR id:64081)
PDF (Main article)
Author's Accepted Manuscript
Language: English |
|
Download this file (PDF/202kB) |
Preview |
Request a format suitable for use with assistive technology e.g. a screenreader | |
PDF (Tables)
Author's Accepted Manuscript
Language: English |
|
Download this file (PDF/308kB) |
Preview |
Request a format suitable for use with assistive technology e.g. a screenreader | |
PDF (Figures)
Author's Accepted Manuscript
Language: English |
|
Download this file (PDF/261kB) |
Preview |
Request a format suitable for use with assistive technology e.g. a screenreader | |
PDF (Appendix)
Author's Accepted Manuscript
Language: English |
|
Download this file (PDF/202kB) |
Preview |
Request a format suitable for use with assistive technology e.g. a screenreader | |
Official URL: https://doi.org/10.1080/14789949.2017.1375542 |
Abstract
Psychological defence mechanisms have been considered important personality processes in the onset, maintenance and recovery of mental disorders. More recently, their application to understanding presenting problems and as potential outcome indicators for forensic patients has been recommended. However, to date there have been no investigations into the reliability and factor structure of defence mechanism assessments for this population. The current study investigated the factor structure, internal consistency and test-retest reliability of the Defence Style Questionnaire-40 (DSQ) for 160 adult male UK forensic patients. The three-factor model of defences proposed by the DSQ-40 developers was not confirmed in the study sample. Reliability indices of the three factors indicated that the Immature factor was the most ‘acceptable’ in terms of internal consistency. Test-retest reliability coefficients ranged from .70 to .91. A revised three-factor structure that closely corresponds to the original validation study is recommended following an exploratory factor analysis. The findings are compared with previous reliability and factor analytic evaluations of the DSQ-40, and recommendations for its use with forensic patients are discussed.
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
DOI/Identification number: | 10.1080/14789949.2017.1375542 |
Uncontrolled keywords: | Forensic patients, defence style questionnaire, assessment, reliability, confirmatory factor analysis |
Subjects: | B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > BF Psychology |
Divisions: | Divisions > Division of Human and Social Sciences > School of Psychology |
Depositing User: | Theresa Gannon |
Date Deposited: | 19 Oct 2017 08:17 UTC |
Last Modified: | 05 Nov 2024 11:00 UTC |
Resource URI: | https://kar.kent.ac.uk/id/eprint/64081 (The current URI for this page, for reference purposes) |
- Link to SensusAccess
- Export to:
- RefWorks
- EPrints3 XML
- BibTeX
- CSV
- Depositors only (login required):