Marchesi, Giacomo, Portaluri, Alessandro, Waterstraat, Nils (2017) Not every conjugate point of a semi-Riemannian geodesic is a bifurcation point. arXiv, . (KAR id:61148)
PDF
Pre-print
Language: English |
|
Download this file (PDF/183kB) |
Preview |
Request a format suitable for use with assistive technology e.g. a screenreader | |
Official URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/1703.10483 |
Abstract
We revisit an example of a semi-Riemannian geodesic that was discussed by Musso, Pejsachowicz and Portaluri in 2007 to show that not every conjugate point is a bifurcation point. We point out a mistake in their argument, showing that on this geodesic actually every conjugate point is a bifurcation point. Finally, we provide an improved example which yields that the claim in our title is nevertheless true.
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
Subjects: |
Q Science > QA Mathematics (inc Computing science) > QA440 Geometry Q Science > QA Mathematics (inc Computing science) > QA801 Analytic mechanics |
Divisions: | Divisions > Division of Computing, Engineering and Mathematical Sciences > School of Mathematics, Statistics and Actuarial Science |
Depositing User: | Nils Waterstraat |
Date Deposited: | 31 Mar 2017 10:51 UTC |
Last Modified: | 05 Nov 2024 10:54 UTC |
Resource URI: | https://kar.kent.ac.uk/id/eprint/61148 (The current URI for this page, for reference purposes) |
- Link to SensusAccess
- Export to:
- RefWorks
- EPrints3 XML
- BibTeX
- CSV
- Depositors only (login required):