Chiesa, Mecca (1992) Radical behaviourism and scientific frameworks: from mechanistic to relational accounts. American Psychologist, 47 (11). pp. 1287-1299. ISSN 0003-066X. (The full text of this publication is not currently available from this repository. You may be able to access a copy if URLs are provided) (KAR id:34589)
The full text of this publication is not currently available from this repository. You may be able to access a copy if URLs are provided. |
Abstract
A substantial portion of B. F. Skinner's scholarship was devoted to developing methods and terms for a scientific study of behavior. Three concepts central to scientific accounts--cause, explanation, and theory--are examined to illustrate the distinction between mechanistic and relational frameworks and radical behaviorism's relationship to those frameworks. Informed by a scientific tradition that explicitly rejects mechanistic interpretations, radical behaviorism provides a distinctive stance in contemporary psychology. The present analysis suggests that radical behaviorism makes closer contact with the "new world view" advocated by physicists and philosophers of science than does much of contemporary psychology
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
Subjects: | H Social Sciences > HV Social pathology. Social and public welfare > HV1568 Disability studies |
Divisions: | Divisions > Division for the Study of Law, Society and Social Justice > School of Social Policy, Sociology and Social Research > Tizard |
Depositing User: | Jo Ruffels |
Date Deposited: | 10 Jul 2013 14:43 UTC |
Last Modified: | 05 Nov 2024 10:17 UTC |
Resource URI: | https://kar.kent.ac.uk/id/eprint/34589 (The current URI for this page, for reference purposes) |
- Export to:
- RefWorks
- EPrints3 XML
- BibTeX
- CSV
- Depositors only (login required):