Skip to main content

Measurement error in direct observations: a comparison of common recording methods

Murphy, Glynis H., Goodall,, Elizabeth (1980) Measurement error in direct observations: a comparison of common recording methods. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 18 (2). pp. 147-150. ISSN 0005-7967. (doi:10.1016/0005-7967(80)90109-6) (The full text of this publication is not currently available from this repository. You may be able to access a copy if URLs are provided) (KAR id:32113)

The full text of this publication is not currently available from this repository. You may be able to access a copy if URLs are provided. (Contact us about this Publication)
Official URL
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0005-7967(80)90109-6

Abstract

Abstract

The implications of these findings for the detection of treatment effects by direct observations are discussed.

Item Type: Article
DOI/Identification number: 10.1016/0005-7967(80)90109-6
Subjects: H Social Sciences > HV Social pathology. Social and public welfare > HV1568 Disability studies
Divisions: Divisions > Division for the Study of Law, Society and Social Justice > School of Social Policy, Sociology and Social Research > Tizard
Depositing User: Jo Ruffels
Date Deposited: 07 Nov 2012 10:32 UTC
Last Modified: 16 Feb 2021 12:43 UTC
Resource URI: https://kar.kent.ac.uk/id/eprint/32113 (The current URI for this page, for reference purposes)
Murphy, Glynis H.: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7817-5861
  • Depositors only (login required):