Safta-Zecheria, Leyla, Tănăsan, Gabriela, Petri, Gabor, UNSPECIFIED (2024) Between a Shrinking and a Shifting Space: The Symbolic Inclusion of the Disability Movement in Policy‐Making in Romania. Revista de Asistenţă Socială / Social Work Review, 1/2024 . pp. 153-165. ISSN 1583-0608. (KAR id:105327)
|
PDF
Publisher pdf
Language: English |
|
|
Download this file (PDF/213kB) |
Preview |
| Request a format suitable for use with assistive technology e.g. a screenreader | |
| Official URL: http://www.swreview.ro/index.pl/between_a_shrinkin... |
|
Abstract
In this paper, we explore how political opportunity structures for the inclusion of the disability movement in Romania are shaped from the perspective of self-advocacy and service provider NGOs active in the field of disability. Building on in-depth semi-structured interviews with nine representatives of self-advocacy and service provider organizations, we explore how they understood the processes by which they participated in policy formulation processes. Our results show that both service provider and self-advocacy organizations feel that their inclusion in the policymaking process is mostly symbolic and tokenistic, but that this can and did change in the last years. However, despite a general concern for a shrinking space for civil society organizations influence on policymaking in Central and East European countries, disability organizations in Romania describe the political opportunity landscape as a fluctuating one, rather than one that is evolving in one direction. Moreover, whereas service provider organizations seem to perceive higher levels of inclusion on the national level, whereas self-advocacy NGOs seem to perceive themselves as being better included and more influential on local levels. This also reflects the presence of bottom-up federative efforts of service provider organizations as opposed to the lack of successful bottom-up federative efforts in the field of disability based self-advocacy organizations. Finally, our paper problematizes inclusion in policy-making as an unequivocally positive process, showing how disability organizations sometimes choose not to participate in order not to legitimize problematic decisions through their symbolic presence in the negotiation process.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled keywords: | movement; disability movement, social movements, political participation, disability movement, social policy, human rights, NGOs, political participation, advocacy, self-advocacy |
| Subjects: |
H Social Sciences H Social Sciences > HN Social history and conditions. Social problems. Social reform H Social Sciences > HV Social pathology. Social and public welfare > HV1568 Disability studies H Social Sciences > HV Social pathology. Social and public welfare > HV3008 People with mental disabilities |
| Institutional Unit: | Schools > School of Psychology > Tizard Centre |
| Former Institutional Unit: |
Divisions > Division for the Study of Law, Society and Social Justice > School of Social Policy, Sociology and Social Research > Tizard
|
| Depositing User: | Gabor Petri |
| Date Deposited: | 14 Mar 2024 18:44 UTC |
| Last Modified: | 22 Jul 2025 09:19 UTC |
| Resource URI: | https://kar.kent.ac.uk/id/eprint/105327 (The current URI for this page, for reference purposes) |
- Link to SensusAccess
- Export to:
- RefWorks
- EPrints3 XML
- BibTeX
- CSV
- Depositors only (login required):

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5033-7838
Total Views
Total Views