Parker, K.T., Vickerstaff, S. (1996) TECs, LECs and small firms: differenfces in provision and performance. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 14 (2). pp. 251-267. ISSN 0263-774X. (doi:10.1068/c140251) (The full text of this publication is not currently available from this repository. You may be able to access a copy if URLs are provided) (KAR id:10107)
The full text of this publication is not currently available from this repository. You may be able to access a copy if URLs are provided. | |
Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1068/c140251 |
Abstract
In this paper the way in which the Training and Enterprise Councils (TECs) and Local Enterprise Companies (LECs) have been responding to the small and medium-sized enterprise (SME) sector is considered. By reference to a questionnaire survey of TECs and LECs the organisational mechanisms and policy initiatives which have been developed to reach SMEs are evaluated. The analysis is concentrated on the differential performance of TECs and LECs and whether size and employment composition factors, or the complexity of the area the TEC or LEC operates in, affects its ability to encourage small-business involvement.
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
DOI/Identification number: | 10.1068/c140251 |
Subjects: | H Social Sciences > HD Industries. Land use. Labor > HD28 Management. Industrial Management |
Divisions: | Divisions > Kent Business School - Division > Kent Business School (do not use) |
Depositing User: | K. Parker |
Date Deposited: | 29 Jun 2011 16:09 UTC |
Last Modified: | 05 Nov 2024 09:43 UTC |
Resource URI: | https://kar.kent.ac.uk/id/eprint/10107 (The current URI for this page, for reference purposes) |
- Export to:
- RefWorks
- EPrints3 XML
- BibTeX
- CSV
- Depositors only (login required):