Skip to main content
Kent Academic Repository

Radiotherapy-induced Malfunctions of Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices: a Meta-analysis.

Xu, Beizheng, Wang, Yueying, Tse, Gary, Chen, Jiayi, Li, Guangping, Korantzopoulos, Panagiotis, Liu, Tong (2023) Radiotherapy-induced Malfunctions of Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices: a Meta-analysis. Heart rhythm, 20 (5). pp. 689-698. ISSN 1547-5271. E-ISSN 1556-3871. (doi:10.1016/j.hrthm.2023.01.024) (The full text of this publication is not currently available from this repository. You may be able to access a copy if URLs are provided) (KAR id:99985)

The full text of this publication is not currently available from this repository. You may be able to access a copy if URLs are provided. (Contact us about this Publication)
Official URL:
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrthm.2023.01.024

Abstract

Radiation therapy (RT) may pose acute and long-term risks for patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs), including pacemakers (PMs) and implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs). We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to examine the association between RT and PMs/ ICDs malfunctions in cancer patients. We searched the literature using the PubMed, the Cochrane clinical trials database, and the Web of Science and Embase, for relative publications until April 2022. Of the 550 initially identified studies, 17 retrospective observational studies including 2,454 patients were finally analyzed. The meta-analysis showed that RT was associated with an increased risk of ICDs malfunctions (OR 2.75, 95%CI 1.74-4.33). Five studies were included in the subgroup analysis regarding photon beam energy showing that radiation induced CIEDs failure was more likely to occur in ICDs when beam energy was ≥10MV (OR 5.28, 95%CI 2.14-13.03). Neutron-generating RT significantly increased the risk of CIEDs malfunctions (OR 3.97, 95%CI 1.70-9.26), especially the risk of reset (OR 5.79, 95%CI 2.37-14.12, p=0.0001). We did not find significant differences in the risk of CIEDs failure between chest RT and other RT sites (OR 1.09, 95%CI 0.63-1.88). Our meta-analysis suggests that ICDs are more likely to be affected by RT than PMs. These adverse events, especially reset, in cancer patients were associated with neutron-generating RT and beam energy ≥10MV. Given the increasing requirement for RT in several cancer patients as well as the increasing implantation rates of CIEDs, a better risk stratification is needed in this setting. [Abstract copyright: Copyright © 2023. Published by Elsevier Inc.]

Item Type: Article
DOI/Identification number: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2023.01.024
Uncontrolled keywords: Meta-analysis, Cardiac implantable electronic devices, Implantable cardioverter-defibrillators, Radiation therapy, Malfunction, Pacemakers
Subjects: Q Science
Divisions: Divisions > Division of Natural Sciences > Kent and Medway Medical School
SWORD Depositor: JISC Publications Router
Depositing User: JISC Publications Router
Date Deposited: 16 Feb 2023 12:14 UTC
Last Modified: 05 Nov 2024 13:05 UTC
Resource URI: https://kar.kent.ac.uk/id/eprint/99985 (The current URI for this page, for reference purposes)

University of Kent Author Information

  • Depositors only (login required):

Total unique views for this document in KAR since July 2020. For more details click on the image.