Blizard, Jodi (2022) Hidden Homelessness in the Context of Contemporary Homelessness Law and Policy. Master of Law by Research (LLMRes) thesis, University of Kent,. (doi:10.22024/UniKent/01.02.99126) (KAR id:99126)
PDF
Language: English
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
|
|
Download this file (PDF/778kB) |
Preview |
Official URL: https://doi.org/10.22024/UniKent/01.02.99126 |
Abstract
This research investigates the ways in which the concept of hidden homelessness is used in the context of contemporary homelessness law and policy. The concept is commonly understood as sofa surfers (a term used to describe individuals who temporarily stay with family and friends because they are homeless) who are missing from sight, support and statistics. The contextual legislation is the Housing Act 1996, Part VII and the Homelessness (Priority Need for Accommodation) (England) Order 2002.
To examine the concept, I analyse legislation and case law in the context of theoretical case studies, national understandings (primarily represented by charitable organisations) and scholarly understandings on hidden homelessness. The last chapter evaluates Canterbury City Council's Housing, Homelessness and Rough Sleeping Strategy 2018-2023 and semi-structured interviews which I conducted with local homeless charities for the purpose of this research; this forms a comparative analysis to national understandings. Reeve and Batty's (2011) finding that hidden homelessness is conceptualised as visibility or exclusion is used to navigate understandings in chapters two to four. I consider the impact that this has on how hidden homelessness is understood, for example conceptualisations of visibility focus on sofa surfing. The thesis also develops Pleace and Hermans' argument that the concept of hidden homelessness should be made redundant (Pleace and Hermans 2020, 52); it is argued that the concept is inconsistent and further obscures understandings of the housing problem. In addition to this, conceptualisations do not effectively relate to a problematic area of the law which already accepts that sofa surfing can be legally defined as homeless. The conclusion recommends that defining homelessness as statutory and non-statutory is a more constructive approach because it highlights the parts of legislation which exclude applicants from the main housing duty.
Item Type: | Thesis (Master of Law by Research (LLMRes)) |
---|---|
DOI/Identification number: | 10.22024/UniKent/01.02.99126 |
Uncontrolled keywords: | Homelessness Hidden Visibility Exclusion Vulnerability Legislation |
Subjects: | K Law |
Divisions: | Divisions > Division for the Study of Law, Society and Social Justice > Kent Law School |
Funders: | University of Kent (https://ror.org/00xkeyj56) |
SWORD Depositor: | System Moodle |
Depositing User: | System Moodle |
Date Deposited: | 13 Dec 2022 17:10 UTC |
Last Modified: | 05 Nov 2024 13:04 UTC |
Resource URI: | https://kar.kent.ac.uk/id/eprint/99126 (The current URI for this page, for reference purposes) |
- Link to SensusAccess
- Export to:
- RefWorks
- EPrints3 XML
- BibTeX
- CSV
- Depositors only (login required):