Skip to main content
Kent Academic Repository

Systematic literature review on the delays in the diagnosis and misdiagnosis of cluster headache

Buture, A., Ahmed, F., Dikomitis, Lisa, Boland, J.W. (2018) Systematic literature review on the delays in the diagnosis and misdiagnosis of cluster headache. Neurological Sciences, 40 (1). pp. 25-39. ISSN 1590-1874. (doi:10.1007/s10072-018-3598-5) (The full text of this publication is not currently available from this repository. You may be able to access a copy if URLs are provided) (KAR id:98470)

The full text of this publication is not currently available from this repository. You may be able to access a copy if URLs are provided. (Contact us about this Publication)
Official URL:
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10072-018-3598-5

Abstract

Introduction: Patients with cluster headache (CH), the most common trigeminal autonomic cephalalgia, often face delayed diagnosis, misdiagnosis and mismanagement. Objectives: To identify, appraise and synthesise clinical studies on the delays in diagnosis and misdiagnosis of CH in order to determine its causes and help the management of this condition. Methods: The systematic review was prepared, conducted and reported in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. It was registered with International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews. A systematic search of different electronic databases (Medline, EMBASE, PsycINFO, PubMed, CINAHL, BNI, HMIC, AMED, HBE and Cochrane Library) was carried out in May 2017. Reference lists of relevant articles were hand searched. Results: The search identified 201 unique studies. Fifteen studies met the inclusion criteria of which 13 case series studies and two survey studies. Nine studies assessed the delays in diagnosis and misdiagnosis of CH, five studies the delays in diagnosis and one study the misdiagnosis of CH. The studies included 4661 patients. Delays in diagnosis, misdiagnosis and mismanagement have been reported in many European countries, Japan and in the USA with well-developed health services. The patients with CH often visited many different clinicians, surgeons and dentists and received multiple diagnosis prior to being correctly diagnosed. Conclusion: This systematic review shows that the delays in the diagnosis of CH are a widespread problem, the time to diagnosis still vary from country to country and both patients and physicians are responsible for the delays in diagnosis.

Item Type: Article
DOI/Identification number: 10.1007/s10072-018-3598-5
Uncontrolled keywords: Diagnostic error, Diagnostic mistake, Mismanagement, Therapeutic error, Unrecognised diagnosis, bibliographic database, cluster headache, delayed diagnosis, diagnostic error, evidence based medicine, evidence based practice, headache, human, idiopathic intracranial hypertension, jaw disease, meta analysis, migraine, nose obstruction, Review, rhinorrhea, risk factor, seasonal variation, sinusitis, systematic review, tension headache, trigeminus neuralgia, cluster headache, delayed diagnosis, diagnostic error, prevention and control, prospective study, retrospective study, trends, Cluster Headache, Delayed Diagnosis, Diagnostic Errors, Humans, Prospective Studies, Retrospective Studies
Subjects: R Medicine
Divisions: Divisions > Division of Natural Sciences > Kent and Medway Medical School
Depositing User: Manfred Gschwandtner
Date Deposited: 30 Nov 2022 17:35 UTC
Last Modified: 05 Dec 2022 12:43 UTC
Resource URI: https://kar.kent.ac.uk/id/eprint/98470 (The current URI for this page, for reference purposes)

University of Kent Author Information

  • Depositors only (login required):

Total unique views for this document in KAR since July 2020. For more details click on the image.