Skip to main content
Kent Academic Repository

Relative enamel thickness, cuspal enamel thickness, and lateral wall enamel thickness in maxillary premolars and molars of apes and hominins

O'Hara, Mackie C, Mahoney, Patrick, Schwartz, Gary, Skinner, Matthew M., Guatelli-Steinberg, Debbie (2020) Relative enamel thickness, cuspal enamel thickness, and lateral wall enamel thickness in maxillary premolars and molars of apes and hominins. In: American Journal of Physical Anthropology. 171 (S69). p. 101. Wiley (KAR id:98048)

PDF Author's Accepted Manuscript
Language: English
Download this file
(PDF/164kB)
[thumbnail of Mackie.pdf]
Request a format suitable for use with assistive technology e.g. a screenreader
XML Word Processing Document (DOCX) Author's Accepted Manuscript
Language: English

Restricted to Repository staff only
Contact us about this Publication
[thumbnail of Mackie.docx]
Official URL:
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/toc/10968644/2020/...

Abstract

High relative enamel thickness (RET), thick cuspal, and thick lateral enamel are hypothesized to protect teeth from fracturing during hard object feeding (durophagy). However, it is unclear whether each trait is exclusive to durophagous species or if they co-occur.

RET, average enamel thickness (AET), cuspal, and lateral enamel thickness were recorded from mesial sections of maxillary premolars and molars. Pan troglodytes (n=8), Gorilla gorilla (n=6), and Homo neanderthalensis (n=8) are less likely to be durophagous; Pongo (n=10) and Paranthropus robustus (n=13) are more likely durophagous. Australopithecus africanus (n=10), Homo naledi (n=9), and Homo sapiens (n=20) provide additional comparisons. Cuspal and lateral enamel thickness was compared to AET within species.

H. neanderthalensis, P. troglodytes, and G. gorilla had low average RET (16.81, 11.30, 9.70, respectively) and none had particularly thick cuspal enamel. The lingual lateral walls of P. troglodytes (UM2) and H. neanderthalensis (UP4) had significantly thicker enamel compared to AET. Average RET of the other hominins was 20 or more. H. naledi (UP4/UM2), H. sapiens (UP4/UM2), and P. robustus (UM2) had significantly thicker enamel over lingual cusp tips than AET. H. naledi (UP4/UM2), H. sapiens (UP4-UM2), A. africanus (UP4-UM2), and P. robustus (UP4/UM2) had significantly thicker lingual lateral walls than AET.

Significant thickening along lingual lateral walls is not exclusively found in durophagous species. The “durophagous” traits co-occur in H. sapiens and P. robustus, but Pongo has only slightly thickened lingual lateral enamel and RET (17.89). Together, results suggest the predicted durophagous enamel distribution may be present in non-durophagous species.

Funding Statement: This research was supported by the Wenner-Gren Foundation, NSF GRFP DGE-1343012 to Mackie O’Hara, the European Research Council (ERC) under the European Union’s Horizon 2020 (ERC-2018-COG-819960), and Max Planck Society.

Item Type: Conference or workshop item (Poster)
Subjects: H Social Sciences
Divisions: Divisions > Division of Human and Social Sciences > School of Anthropology and Conservation
Depositing User: Patrick Mahoney
Date Deposited: 16 Nov 2022 11:06 UTC
Last Modified: 17 Nov 2022 14:35 UTC
Resource URI: https://kar.kent.ac.uk/id/eprint/98048 (The current URI for this page, for reference purposes)

University of Kent Author Information

  • Depositors only (login required):

Total unique views for this document in KAR since July 2020. For more details click on the image.