Lock, Mikaella, M. G., Griffiths, Richard A. (2022) Detectability of reptiles in standardised surveys: a test using grass snake Natrix helvetica models. The Herpetological Journal, 32 (4). pp. 183-189. ISSN 0268-0130. (doi:10.33256/32.4.183189) (KAR id:97952)
PDF
Publisher pdf
Language: English |
|
Download this file (PDF/805kB) |
Preview |
Request a format suitable for use with assistive technology e.g. a screenreader | |
Microsoft Excel (Original data)
Supplemental Material
Language: English
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
|
|
Download this file (Microsoft Excel/849kB) |
Preview |
Request a format suitable for use with assistive technology e.g. a screenreader | |
Official URL: https://doi.org/10.33256/32.4.183189 |
Abstract
The ability to detect snakes in the field may be influenced by phenotypic and morphological variables attributable to the target species. These variables include body size, colouration, and body posture. To test what effect these variables had on detectability by surveyors, plasticine model grass snakes were distributed along a predetermined transect in reptile habitat. Detections of different types of snake models along the transect were compared between two groups of inexperienced students and those of a single experienced observer. The experienced surveyor detected 72 % of all the snake models, compared to 53 % and 58 % by the inexperienced groups. All groups detected more larger snakes than smaller snakes, and more uncoiled snakes than coiled snakes. The presence of a yellow/black collar did not influence the detection of the snakes. The results demonstrate the observer bias that may be inherent in surveys of snakes due to variation in size and posture of the target animals. Accounting for such biases in the design of reptile surveys and providing appropriate training and experience for volunteers may improve the validity and interpretation of data collected within citizen science programmes.
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
DOI/Identification number: | 10.33256/32.4.183189 |
Uncontrolled keywords: | population assessment, imperfect detection, citizen science, survey protocol |
Subjects: | G Geography. Anthropology. Recreation > GE Environmental Sciences |
Divisions: | Divisions > Division of Human and Social Sciences > School of Anthropology and Conservation > DICE (Durrell Institute of Conservation and Ecology) |
Funders: | University of Kent (https://ror.org/00xkeyj56) |
Depositing User: | Richard Griffiths |
Date Deposited: | 13 Nov 2022 20:53 UTC |
Last Modified: | 05 Nov 2024 13:03 UTC |
Resource URI: | https://kar.kent.ac.uk/id/eprint/97952 (The current URI for this page, for reference purposes) |
- Link to SensusAccess
- Export to:
- RefWorks
- EPrints3 XML
- BibTeX
- CSV
- Depositors only (login required):