Roberts, David L., Hinsley, Amy, Fiennes, Sicily B., Veríssimo, Diogo (2023) Understanding the drivers of expert opinion when classifying species as extinct. Conservation Biology, 37 (1). Article Number e13968. ISSN 0888-8892. (doi:10.1111/cobi.14001) (KAR id:96839)
PDF
Publisher pdf
Language: English
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
|
|
Download this file (PDF/694kB) |
Preview |
Request a format suitable for use with assistive technology e.g. a screenreader | |
PDF
Author's Accepted Manuscript
Language: English |
|
Download this file (PDF/830kB) |
Preview |
Request a format suitable for use with assistive technology e.g. a screenreader | |
Official URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.14001 |
Abstract
The criteria as laid out by the International Union for the Conservation of Nature (IUCN) Red List are the gold standard by which the extinction risk of a species is assessed, and where appropriate biological extinctions are declared. However, unlike all other categories, the category of extinct lacks a quantitative framework for assigning this category. Given its subjective nature, here we explore attributes used by expert assessors working on a diversity of taxa when declaring a species as extinct. Using a choice experiment approach, we found that data availability, time from last sighting and population decline were critical attributes favored by assessors when inferring extinction. Although several of these attributes were significant in the decisions of assessors, this information provides a clear hierarchy of preference for certain attributes. This provides a basis for informing the development of specific criteria for more accurately assessing species extinctions.
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
DOI/Identification number: | 10.1111/cobi.14001 |
Uncontrolled keywords: | conservation status, discrete choice experiments, expert elicitation, extirpation, IUCN Red List, threat, amenaza, estado de conservación, experimentos de elección discreta, extirpación, Lista Roja UICN, recabación de expertos, 濒危等级, 专家引导, 灭绝, 离散性选择实验, IUCN 红色名录, 威胁 |
Subjects: |
Q Science > QH Natural history Q Science > QH Natural history > QH75 Conservation (Biology) |
Divisions: |
Divisions > Division of Human and Social Sciences > School of Anthropology and Conservation Divisions > Division of Human and Social Sciences > School of Anthropology and Conservation > DICE (Durrell Institute of Conservation and Ecology) |
Funders: | University of Kent (https://ror.org/00xkeyj56) |
Depositing User: | David Roberts |
Date Deposited: | 09 Sep 2022 10:06 UTC |
Last Modified: | 05 Nov 2024 13:01 UTC |
Resource URI: | https://kar.kent.ac.uk/id/eprint/96839 (The current URI for this page, for reference purposes) |
- Link to SensusAccess
- Export to:
- RefWorks
- EPrints3 XML
- BibTeX
- CSV
- Depositors only (login required):