Skip to main content
Kent Academic Repository

A qualitative study of the acceptability of cognitive bias modification for paranoia (CBM-pa) in patients with psychosis

Leung, C J, Fosuaah, A, Frerichs, J, Heslin, M, Kabir, T, Lee, T M C, McGuire, P, Meek, C, Mouchlianitis, E, Nath, A S, and others. (2019) A qualitative study of the acceptability of cognitive bias modification for paranoia (CBM-pa) in patients with psychosis. BMC Psychiatry, 19 (1). ISSN 1471-244X. (doi:10.1186/s12888-019-2215-3) (The full text of this publication is not currently available from this repository. You may be able to access a copy if URLs are provided) (KAR id:96400)

The full text of this publication is not currently available from this repository. You may be able to access a copy if URLs are provided. (Contact us about this Publication)
Official URL:
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-019-2215-3

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Cognitive Bias Modification (CBM) has been used successfully as a computer-based intervention in disorders such as anxiety. However, CBM to modify interpretations of ambiguous information relevant to paranoia has not yet been tested. We conducted a qualitative investigation of a novel intervention called CBM for paranoia (CBM-pa) to examine its acceptability in patients with psychosis.METHODS: Eight participants with psychosis who completed CBM-pa were identified by purposive sampling and invited for a semi-structured interview to explore the facilitators and barriers to participation, optimum form of delivery, perceived usefulness of CBM-pa and their opinions on applying CBM-pa as a computerised intervention. The interviews were transcribed and analysed using thematic analysis by researchers working in collaboration with service users.RESULTS: Themes emerged relating to participants' perception about delivery, engagement, programme understanding, factors influencing experience, perceived impact and application of CBM-pa. CBM-pa was regarded as easy, straightforward and enjoyable. It was well-accepted among those we interviewed, who understood the procedure as a psychological intervention. Patients reported that it increased their capacity for adopting alternative interpretations of emotionally ambiguous scenarios. Although participants all agreed on the test-like nature of the current CBM-pa format, they considered that taking part in sessions had improved their overall wellbeing. Most of them valued the computer-based interface of CBM-pa but favoured the idea of combining CBM-pa with some form of human interaction.CONCLUSIONS: CBM-pa is an acceptable intervention that was well-received by our sample of patients with paranoia. The current findings reflect positively on the acceptability and experience of CBM-pa in the target population. Patient opinion supports further development and testing of CBM-pa as a possible adjunct treatment for paranoia.TRIAL REGISTRATION: Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN: 90749868 . Retrospectively registered on 12 May 2016.

Item Type: Article
DOI/Identification number: 10.1186/s12888-019-2215-3
Uncontrolled keywords: Cognitive bias modification, Interpretation bias, Paranoia, Psychosis, Qualitative research
Subjects: R Medicine
Divisions: Divisions > Division of Natural Sciences > Kent and Medway Medical School
Funders: National Institute for Health Research (https://ror.org/0187kwz08)
South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust (https://ror.org/015803449)
King's College London (https://ror.org/0220mzb33)
Depositing User: Rachael Heller
Date Deposited: 03 Oct 2022 09:48 UTC
Last Modified: 04 Mar 2024 20:00 UTC
Resource URI: https://kar.kent.ac.uk/id/eprint/96400 (The current URI for this page, for reference purposes)

University of Kent Author Information

  • Depositors only (login required):

Total unique views for this document in KAR since July 2020. For more details click on the image.