Leung, C J, Fosuaah, A, Frerichs, J, Heslin, M, Kabir, T, Lee, T M C, McGuire, P, Meek, C, Mouchlianitis, E, Nath, A S, and others. (2019) A qualitative study of the acceptability of cognitive bias modification for paranoia (CBM-pa) in patients with psychosis. BMC Psychiatry, 19 (1). ISSN 1471-244X. (doi:10.1186/s12888-019-2215-3) (The full text of this publication is not currently available from this repository. You may be able to access a copy if URLs are provided) (KAR id:96400)
The full text of this publication is not currently available from this repository. You may be able to access a copy if URLs are provided. (Contact us about this Publication) | |
Official URL: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-019-2215-3 |
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Cognitive Bias Modification (CBM) has been used successfully as a computer-based intervention in disorders such as anxiety. However, CBM to modify interpretations of ambiguous information relevant to paranoia has not yet been tested. We conducted a qualitative investigation of a novel intervention called CBM for paranoia (CBM-pa) to examine its acceptability in patients with psychosis.METHODS: Eight participants with psychosis who completed CBM-pa were identified by purposive sampling and invited for a semi-structured interview to explore the facilitators and barriers to participation, optimum form of delivery, perceived usefulness of CBM-pa and their opinions on applying CBM-pa as a computerised intervention. The interviews were transcribed and analysed using thematic analysis by researchers working in collaboration with service users.RESULTS: Themes emerged relating to participants' perception about delivery, engagement, programme understanding, factors influencing experience, perceived impact and application of CBM-pa. CBM-pa was regarded as easy, straightforward and enjoyable. It was well-accepted among those we interviewed, who understood the procedure as a psychological intervention. Patients reported that it increased their capacity for adopting alternative interpretations of emotionally ambiguous scenarios. Although participants all agreed on the test-like nature of the current CBM-pa format, they considered that taking part in sessions had improved their overall wellbeing. Most of them valued the computer-based interface of CBM-pa but favoured the idea of combining CBM-pa with some form of human interaction.CONCLUSIONS: CBM-pa is an acceptable intervention that was well-received by our sample of patients with paranoia. The current findings reflect positively on the acceptability and experience of CBM-pa in the target population. Patient opinion supports further development and testing of CBM-pa as a possible adjunct treatment for paranoia.TRIAL REGISTRATION: Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN: 90749868 . Retrospectively registered on 12 May 2016.
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
DOI/Identification number: | 10.1186/s12888-019-2215-3 |
Uncontrolled keywords: | Cognitive bias modification, Interpretation bias, Paranoia, Psychosis, Qualitative research |
Subjects: | R Medicine |
Divisions: | Divisions > Division of Natural Sciences > Kent and Medway Medical School |
Funders: |
National Institute for Health Research (https://ror.org/0187kwz08)
South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust (https://ror.org/015803449) King's College London (https://ror.org/0220mzb33) |
Depositing User: | Rachael Heller |
Date Deposited: | 03 Oct 2022 09:48 UTC |
Last Modified: | 05 Nov 2024 13:01 UTC |
Resource URI: | https://kar.kent.ac.uk/id/eprint/96400 (The current URI for this page, for reference purposes) |
- Export to:
- RefWorks
- EPrints3 XML
- BibTeX
- CSV
- Depositors only (login required):