Skip to main content
Kent Academic Repository

First clinical report of 179 surrogacy cases in the UK: Implications for policy and practice

Horsey, Kirsty, Gibson, Grace, Lamanna, Giuseppina, Priddle, Helen, Linara-Demakakou, Elena, Nair, Shajila, Arian-Schad, Mimi, Thackare, Hemlata, Rimington, Michael, Macklon, Nick, and others. (2022) First clinical report of 179 surrogacy cases in the UK: Implications for policy and practice. Reproductive BioMedicine Online, . ISSN 1472-6483. (doi:10.1016/j.rbmo.2022.05.027) (KAR id:95449)

Abstract

Research question: What implications for policy and practice can be derived from outcomes and trends observed across 8 years of a surrogacy programme in two UK-regulated IVF centres (London, Cardiff)?

Design: Retrospective cohort study analysing surrogacy treatments undertaken between 2014 and September 2021.

Results: Surrogacy continues to rise in popularity in the UK despite the inability of those supporting safe and professional practice to advertise to recruit surrogates. In two IVF centres regulated by the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority (HFEA), both the number of surrogacy treatments and the proportion of those undertaken on behalf of same-sex male intended parents increased year on year in the period studied. From a cohort of 108 surrogates, 71 babies were born to 61 surrogates (with five pregnancies ongoing) by February 2022. No statistically significant difference in live birth rates (LBR) was observed between the heterosexual couples and same-sex male couples. Sample sizes of single and transgender intended parents were too small (n < 5) to compare. The use of vitrified oocytes in surrogacy treatments has increased year on year, while fresh oocyte use has declined since peaking in 2019. There was no significant difference in LBR between fresh and vitrified oocyte usage across the cohort.

Conclusions: The number of surrogacy treatments steadily increased, with clear evidence that the proportion of same-sex male couples accessing surrogacy is a major contributor to this growth. Vitrified/warmed oocyte use now outstrips the use of fresh oocytes in the surrogacy treatment cycles studied here. The results represent a strong basis for supporting the liberalization of regulatory reform expected to be introduced in the UK later in 2022.

Item Type: Article
DOI/Identification number: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2022.05.027
Uncontrolled keywords: surrogacy, IVF, intended parents, live birth rate, vitrified oocytes
Subjects: H Social Sciences
K Law
Divisions: Divisions > Division for the Study of Law, Society and Social Justice > Kent Law School
Funders: University of Kent (https://ror.org/00xkeyj56)
Depositing User: Kirsty Horsey
Date Deposited: 15 Jun 2022 11:02 UTC
Last Modified: 05 Nov 2024 13:00 UTC
Resource URI: https://kar.kent.ac.uk/id/eprint/95449 (The current URI for this page, for reference purposes)

University of Kent Author Information

  • Depositors only (login required):

Total unique views for this document in KAR since July 2020. For more details click on the image.