Skip to main content
Kent Academic Repository

Changing children's intergroup attitudes towards stigmatised groups : testing theoretically derived prejudice-reduction interventions

Cameron, Lindsey (2005) Changing children's intergroup attitudes towards stigmatised groups : testing theoretically derived prejudice-reduction interventions. Doctor of Philosophy (PhD) thesis, University of Kent. (doi:10.22024/UniKent/01.02.94258) (KAR id:94258)

PDF (Optical Character Recognition (OCR) of this thesis enables read aloud functionality of the text.)
Language: English


Download this file
(PDF/120MB)
[thumbnail of Optical Character Recognition (OCR) of this thesis enables read aloud functionality of the text.]
Preview
Official URL:
https://doi.org/10.22024/UniKent/01.02.94258

Abstract

The aim of this thesis was to design and evaluate theoretically derived prejudice- reduction interventions for children (5 to 11 years) as a means of obtaining more effective prejudice-reduction interventions and advancing psychological theories of prejudice. In the thesis, the potential contribution of psychology to the intervention literature in terms of theoretical models and methodological issues is discussed and its contribution to the intervention literature to date is analysed.

The interventions tested are multiple classification skills training and a number of versions of extended contact, which were derived from different models of inter-group contact. Interventions were evaluated using measures of out- and in-group attitude, intended behaviour, affect and implicit bias. Throughout the thesis it is hypothesised that, following the interventions, children will hold more favourable out-group attitudes. It is predicted that, of the extended contact models, the ‘inter-group’ and ‘dual identity’ versions will be the most effective. It is also hypothesised that the extended contact effect will be mediated by ‘inclusion of other in the self and perceived norms, and will be moderated by age and identity. It is expected that implicit bias will be reduced following interventions, but only in the older age group.

The results of four experimental studies are presented and the hypotheses are considered in each chapter. In summary, the findings show strong support for the use of extended contact, especially ‘dual identity’ and ‘inter-group’ extended contact, as a prejudice reduction tool in children aged 5 to 11 years. There is little support for the multiple-classification skills training intervention. Results indicate that extended contact is mediated by ‘inclusion of other in the self and is moderated by in-group identity. Perceived in-group norm does not appear to be a mediator of extended contact. The theoretical and practical implications of these findings are discussed. It is concluded that by incorporating psychological theories into prejudice-reduction interventions, and by considering psychological issues in the implementation and evaluation of these interventions, this can lead to effective prejudice-reduction tools and also advance psychological theories of prejudice.

Item Type: Thesis (Doctor of Philosophy (PhD))
Thesis advisor: Rutland, Adam
DOI/Identification number: 10.22024/UniKent/01.02.94258
Additional information: This thesis has been digitised by EThOS, the British Library digitisation service, for purposes of preservation and dissemination. It was uploaded to KAR on 25 April 2022 in order to hold its content and record within University of Kent systems. It is available Open Access using a Creative Commons Attribution, Non-commercial, No Derivatives (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) licence so that the thesis and its author, can benefit from opportunities for increased readership and citation. This was done in line with University of Kent policies (https://www.kent.ac.uk/is/strategy/docs/Kent%20Open%20Access%20policy.pdf). If you feel that your rights are compromised by open access to this thesis, or if you would like more information about its availability, please contact us at ResearchSupport@kent.ac.uk and we will seriously consider your claim under the terms of our Take-Down Policy (https://www.kent.ac.uk/is/regulations/library/kar-take-down-policy.html).
Subjects: B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > BF Psychology
Divisions: Divisions > Division of Human and Social Sciences > School of Psychology
SWORD Depositor: SWORD Copy
Depositing User: SWORD Copy
Date Deposited: 27 Oct 2022 15:49 UTC
Last Modified: 27 Oct 2022 15:49 UTC
Resource URI: https://kar.kent.ac.uk/id/eprint/94258 (The current URI for this page, for reference purposes)

University of Kent Author Information

  • Depositors only (login required):

Total unique views for this document in KAR since July 2020. For more details click on the image.