Skip to main content

Their own worst enemy? Collective narcissists are willing to conspire against their ingroup

Biddlestone, Mikey, Cichocka, Aleksandra, Glowczewski, Michal, Cislak, Aleksandra (2022) Their own worst enemy? Collective narcissists are willing to conspire against their ingroup. British Journal of Psychology, . ISSN 0007-1269. (doi:10.1111/bjop.12569) (KAR id:94127)

PDF Publisher pdf
Language: English


Download (917kB) Preview
[thumbnail of Cichocka_their own worst enemy.pdf]
Preview
This file may not be suitable for users of assistive technology.
Request an accessible format
PDF Author's Accepted Manuscript
Language: English

Restricted to Repository staff only
Contact us about this Publication
[thumbnail of KAR.pdf]
Official URL:
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bjop.12569

Abstract

Collective narcissism—a belief in ingroup greatness that is not appreciated by others—is associated with using one’s group for personal benefits. Across one pilot and four studies, we demonstrated that collective narcissism predicts readiness to conspire against ingroup members (r\(_{meta-analysis}\) = .24). In Study 1, conducted in Poland (N = 361), collective narcissism measured in the context of national identity predicted readiness to engage in secret surveillance against one’s own country’s citizens. In Study 2 (N = 174; pre-registered), collective narcissism in UK workplace teams predicted intentions to engage in conspiracies against co-workers. In Study 3 (N = 471; pre-registered), US national narcissism predicted intentions to conspire against fellow citizens. Furthermore, conspiracy intentions accounted for the relationship between collective narcissism and beliefs in conspiracy theories about the ingroup. Finally, in Study 4 (N = 1,064; pre-registered), we corroborated the link between Polish national narcissism and conspiracy intentions against fellow citizens, further showing that these intentions were only directed towards group members that were perceived as moderately or strongly typical of the national ingroup (but not when perceived ingroup typicality was low). Ingroup identification was either negatively related (Studies 1 and 2) or unrelated (Studies 3 and 4) to conspiracy intentions (r\(_{meta-analysis}\) = .04). We discuss implications for research on conspiracy theories and populism.

Item Type: Article
DOI/Identification number: 10.1111/bjop.12569
Uncontrolled keywords: collective narcissism, ingroup identification, conspiracy theories, conspiracy beliefs, populism
Subjects: B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > BF Psychology
Divisions: Divisions > Division of Human and Social Sciences > School of Psychology
Depositing User: Aleksandra Cichocka
Date Deposited: 24 Apr 2022 10:04 UTC
Last Modified: 09 May 2022 09:24 UTC
Resource URI: https://kar.kent.ac.uk/id/eprint/94127 (The current URI for this page, for reference purposes)
Cichocka, Aleksandra: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1703-1586
  • Depositors only (login required):

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year