Biddlestone, Mikey, Cichocka, Aleksandra, Glowczewski, Michal, Cislak, Aleksandra (2022) Their own worst enemy? Collective narcissists are willing to conspire against their ingroup. British Journal of Psychology, . ISSN 0007-1269. (doi:10.1111/bjop.12569) (KAR id:94127)
PDF
Publisher pdf
Language: English
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
|
|
Download this file (PDF/863kB) |
|
Request a format suitable for use with assistive technology e.g. a screenreader | |
PDF
Author's Accepted Manuscript
Language: English Restricted to Repository staff only |
|
Contact us about this Publication
|
|
Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bjop.12569 |
Abstract
Collective narcissism—a belief in ingroup greatness that is not appreciated by others—is associated with using one’s group for personal benefits. Across one pilot and four studies, we demonstrated that collective narcissism predicts readiness to conspire against ingroup members (r\(_{meta-analysis}\) = .24). In Study 1, conducted in Poland (N = 361), collective narcissism measured in the context of national identity predicted readiness to engage in secret surveillance against one’s own country’s citizens. In Study 2 (N = 174; pre-registered), collective narcissism in UK workplace teams predicted intentions to engage in conspiracies against co-workers. In Study 3 (N = 471; pre-registered), US national narcissism predicted intentions to conspire against fellow citizens. Furthermore, conspiracy intentions accounted for the relationship between collective narcissism and beliefs in conspiracy theories about the ingroup. Finally, in Study 4 (N = 1,064; pre-registered), we corroborated the link between Polish national narcissism and conspiracy intentions against fellow citizens, further showing that these intentions were only directed towards group members that were perceived as moderately or strongly typical of the national ingroup (but not when perceived ingroup typicality was low). Ingroup identification was either negatively related (Studies 1 and 2) or unrelated (Studies 3 and 4) to conspiracy intentions (r\(_{meta-analysis}\) = .04). We discuss implications for research on conspiracy theories and populism.
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
DOI/Identification number: | 10.1111/bjop.12569 |
Uncontrolled keywords: | collective narcissism, ingroup identification, conspiracy theories, conspiracy beliefs, populism |
Subjects: | B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > BF Psychology |
Divisions: | Divisions > Division of Human and Social Sciences > School of Psychology |
Depositing User: | Aleksandra Cichocka |
Date Deposited: | 24 Apr 2022 10:04 UTC |
Last Modified: | 04 Jul 2023 14:52 UTC |
Resource URI: | https://kar.kent.ac.uk/id/eprint/94127 (The current URI for this page, for reference purposes) |
- Link to SensusAccess
- Export to:
- RefWorks
- EPrints3 XML
- BibTeX
- CSV
- Depositors only (login required):