Masala, Giovanni Luca, Golosio, B., Oliva, P., Cascio, D., Fauci, F., Tangaro, S., Quarta, M., Cheran, S. C., Lopez Torres, E. (2005) Classifiers trained on dissimilarity representation of medical pattern: A comparative study. Nuovo Cimento della Societa Italiana di Fisica. C, Geophysics and Space Physics, 28 (6). pp. 905-912. ISSN 1124-1896. (doi:10.1393/ncc/i2005-10162-9) (The full text of this publication is not currently available from this repository. You may be able to access a copy if URLs are provided) (KAR id:92335)
The full text of this publication is not currently available from this repository. You may be able to access a copy if URLs are provided. | |
Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1393/ncc/i2005-10162-9 |
Abstract
In this paper we investigate the feasibility of some typical techniques of pattern recognition for the classification of medical examples. The learning of the classifiers is not made in the traditional features space but it can be made by constructing decision rules on dissimilarity (distance) representations. In such a recognition process a new object is described by its distances to (a subset of) the training samples. Purpose of this work is the development of an automatic classification system which could be useful for radiologists in the investigation of breast cancer. The software has been designed in the framework of the MAGIC-5 collaboration. In the automatic classification system the suspicious regions with high probability to include a lesion are extracted from the image as regions of interest (ROIs). Each ROI is characterized by some features extracted from co-occurrence matrix containing spatial statistics information on ROI pixel gray tones. A dissimilarity representation of these features is made before the classification. A Feed-Forward Neural Network (FF-NN), a K-Nearest Neighbour (K-NN) and a Linear Discriminant Analysis (LDA) are employed to distinguish pathological records from not-pathological ones by the new features. The results obtained in terms of sensitivity (percentage of pathological ROIs correctly classified) and specificity (percentage of healthy ROIs correctly classified) will be comparatively presented. The K-NN classifier gives slightly better results than FF-NN and LDA accuracy (percentage of cases correctly classified) on two-classes problem (pathologic or healthy patients).
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
DOI/Identification number: | 10.1393/ncc/i2005-10162-9 |
Uncontrolled keywords: | accuracy; comparative evaluations; diagnostic techniques; image processing; nuclear medicine; radiology; evaluation; medicine; nuclear medicine; processing |
Subjects: | Q Science > QA Mathematics (inc Computing science) > QA 75 Electronic computers. Computer science |
Divisions: | Divisions > Division of Computing, Engineering and Mathematical Sciences > School of Computing |
Depositing User: | Amy Boaler |
Date Deposited: | 14 Dec 2021 14:26 UTC |
Last Modified: | 05 Nov 2024 12:57 UTC |
Resource URI: | https://kar.kent.ac.uk/id/eprint/92335 (The current URI for this page, for reference purposes) |
- Export to:
- RefWorks
- EPrints3 XML
- BibTeX
- CSV
- Depositors only (login required):