Skip to main content
Kent Academic Repository

Where do early career researchers stand on Open Science practices? A survey within the Max Planck Society

Toribio-Flórez, Daniel, Anneser, Lukas, deOliveira-Lopes, Felipe Nathan, Pallandt, Martijn, Tunn, Isabell, Windel, Hendrik (2021) Where do early career researchers stand on Open Science practices? A survey within the Max Planck Society. Frontiers in Research Metrics and Analytics, 5 . Article Number 586992. ISSN 2504-0537. (doi:10.3389/frma.2020.586992) (KAR id:92191)


Open science (OS) is of paramount importance for the improvement of science worldwide and across research fields. Recent years have witnessed a transition toward open and transparent scientific practices, but there is still a long way to go. Early career researchers (ECRs) are of crucial relevance in the process of steering toward the standardization of OS practices, as they will become the future decision makers of the institutional change that necessarily accompanies this transition. Thus, it is imperative to gain insight into where ECRs stand on OS practices. Under this premise, the Open Science group of the Max Planck PhDnet designed and conducted an online survey to assess the stance toward OS practices of doctoral candidates from the Max Planck Society. As one of the leading scientific institutions for basic research worldwide, the Max Planck Society provides a considerable population of researchers from multiple scientific fields, englobed into three sections: biomedical sciences, chemistry, physics and technology, and human and social sciences. From an approximate total population of 5,100 doctoral candidates affiliated with the Max Planck Society, the survey collected responses from 568 doctoral candidates. The survey assessed self-reported knowledge, attitudes, and implementation of different OS practices, namely, open access publications, open data, preregistrations, registered reports, and replication studies. ECRs seemed to hold a generally positive view toward these different practices and to be interested in learning more about them. Furthermore, we found that ECRs’ knowledge and positive attitudes predicted the extent to which they implemented these OS practices, although levels of implementation were rather low in the past. We observed differences and similarities between scientific sections. We discuss these differences in terms of need and feasibility to apply these OS practices in specific scientific fields, but additionally in relation to the incentive systems that shape scientific communities. Lastly, we discuss the implications that these results can have for the training and career advancement of ECRs, and ultimately, for the consolidation of OS practices.

Item Type: Article
DOI/Identification number: 10.3389/frma.2020.586992
Uncontrolled keywords: survey, replication studies, registered report, preregistration, open data, open access, early career researchers, open science
Subjects: L Education
Divisions: Divisions > Division of Human and Social Sciences > School of Psychology
Depositing User: Daniel Toribio Florez
Date Deposited: 07 Dec 2021 19:41 UTC
Last Modified: 10 Dec 2021 09:30 UTC
Resource URI: (The current URI for this page, for reference purposes)

University of Kent Author Information

Toribio-Flórez, Daniel.

Creator's ORCID:
CReDIT Contributor Roles:
  • Depositors only (login required):

Total unique views for this document in KAR since July 2020. For more details click on the image.