Skip to main content

The disparity between species description and conservation assessment: A case study in taxa with high rates of species discovery

Tapley, B., Michaels, C.J., Gumbs, R., Böhm, M., Luedtke, J., Pearce-Kelly, P., Rowley, J.J.L. (2018) The disparity between species description and conservation assessment: A case study in taxa with high rates of species discovery. Biological Conservation, 220 . pp. 209-214. (doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2018.01.022) (KAR id:90569)

PDF Author's Accepted Manuscript
Language: English


Download (353kB) Preview
[thumbnail of Bohm_BIOC2017968_R1 Disparity between species description&assessment unmarked.pdf]
Preview
This file may not be suitable for users of assistive technology.
Request an accessible format
Official URL:
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2018.01.022

Abstract

The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species (Red List) details the extinction risk of the world's species and presents an important biodiversity indicator for conservation policy. Its continued utility relies on it containing up-to-date information on the extinction risk of species. This requires both regular reassessments and the timely assessment of newly described species. We provide an overview of the status of amphibian Red List assessments to highlight the difficulties of keeping assessments updated for species groups with high rates of species description. Since the publication of the IUCN's Global Amphibian Assessment in 2004, description rates of new species and assessment rates were initially similar; yet while the former has remained consistent, the latter has recently sharply declined. Currently 61.3% of amphibian species are either Not Evaluated or have out-of-date assessments. The situation is particularly problematic in countries with the richest amphibian diversity, which typically have the highest rates of amphibian species discovery and face the greatest threats. Efforts to keep the Red List up-to-date are primarily limited by funding, we estimate that an annual investment of US $170,478–$319,290 is needed to have an up-to-date Red List for amphibians. We propose suggestions to increase assessment rates by improving the availability of data relevant to the process: authors of species descriptions or taxonomic revisions should publish information relevant to Red List assessments. Taxonomic journals should suggest inclusion of such information in their author guidelines. We suggest that contributors with significant input into assessments should be rewarded with co-authorship of published assessments.

Item Type: Article
DOI/Identification number: 10.1016/j.biocon.2018.01.022
Uncontrolled keywords: Amphibian Conservation prioritization Global amphibian assessment IUCN red list of threatened species Extinction risk
Divisions: Divisions > Division of Human and Social Sciences > School of Anthropology and Conservation > DICE (Durrell Institute of Conservation and Ecology)
Depositing User: Benjamin Tapley
Date Deposited: 06 Oct 2021 09:47 UTC
Last Modified: 11 Oct 2021 11:32 UTC
Resource URI: https://kar.kent.ac.uk/id/eprint/90569 (The current URI for this page, for reference purposes)
Tapley, B.: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9787-3793
Michaels, C.J.: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4733-8397
Gumbs, R.: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4157-8549
Böhm, M.: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0585-0832
Luedtke, J.: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5162-978X
Pearce-Kelly, P.: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2356-7061
Rowley, J.J.L.: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2011-9143
  • Depositors only (login required):

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year