Hill, Mark J., Tolonen, Mikko (2021) A Computational Investigation into the Authorship of Sister Peg. Eighteenth-century studies, 54 (4). pp. 861-885. ISSN 0013-2586. (doi:10.1353/ecs.2021.0095) (KAR id:90139)
PDF
Publisher pdf
Language: English
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
|
|
Download this file (PDF/5MB) |
Preview |
Request a format suitable for use with assistive technology e.g. a screenreader | |
Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1353/ecs.2021.0095 |
Abstract
This article engages with the longstanding debate over the authorship of the Scottish Militia pamphlet Sister Peg (1761). While previous evidence is born out of rigorous historical research, a debate remains between whether Adam Ferguson or David Hume was the author. This article uses computational stylometry to statistically investigate this question, with the aim of complementing existing historical evidence rather than overturning it. In doing this it concludes that the work was not written solely by David Hume and, instead, Adam Ferguson is likely to be the sole author or there was a more complicated history of co-authorship.
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
DOI/Identification number: | 10.1353/ecs.2021.0095 |
Uncontrolled keywords: | Eighteenth century history, digital humanities, stylometry, authorship attribution, David Hume, Adam Ferguson, Sister Peg, Scottish militia |
Subjects: |
D History General and Old World D History General and Old World > D History (General) > D203 Modern History, 1453- |
Divisions: | Divisions > Division for the Study of Law, Society and Social Justice > School of Social Policy, Sociology and Social Research |
Depositing User: | Mark Hill |
Date Deposited: | 10 Sep 2021 12:42 UTC |
Last Modified: | 04 Mar 2024 18:31 UTC |
Resource URI: | https://kar.kent.ac.uk/id/eprint/90139 (The current URI for this page, for reference purposes) |
- Link to SensusAccess
- Export to:
- RefWorks
- EPrints3 XML
- BibTeX
- CSV
- Depositors only (login required):