Bamdad, Sara, Finaughty, Devin A., Johns, Sarah E. (2022) ‘Grey Areas’: Ethical challenges posed by social media-enabled recruitment and online data collection in cross-border, social science research. Research Ethics, 18 (1). pp. 24-38. ISSN 1747-0161. E-ISSN 2047-6094. (KAR id:90080)
PDF
Publisher pdf
Language: English
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
|
|
Download this file (PDF/174kB) |
|
Request a format suitable for use with assistive technology e.g. a screenreader | |
Official URL: https://doi.org/10.1177/17470161211045557 |
Abstract
Are social science, cross-border research projects, where recruitment and data collection are carried out remotely (e.g. through social media and online platforms), required to follow similar ethical and data-sharing procedures as ‘on-the-ground’ studies that use traditional means of recruitment and participant engagement? This article reflects on our experience of dealing with this question when we (multi-national but UK based researchers) had to switch to online data collection due to the restrictions posed by the COVID-19 pandemic, such as the inability to travel or work in person with local communities and collaborators. Using social media platforms and online data collection when conducting research brings many advantages, such as being able to communicate remotely but directly with gatekeepers and collaborators, and in reaching potential participants on a global scale. However, neither the guidelines and advice for conducting ethically sound internet-based research, nor the academic literature focussed on building equitable research partnerships between the Global North and the Global South, offer much information regarding the ethical concerns, or address the grey areas, posed by this type of digital and distanced transnational research. In our experience, conducting research remotely made negotiations of access very challenging due to the politics of positionality between Global North and South researchers, lack of clarity on ethical processes and (mis)perceptions of gatekeepers who we could not meet in person. We hope the reflections on, and discussion of, our experience encourage deliberation on the present ethical challenges posed by online and social-media-disseminated data collection, particularly in cross-border circumstances.
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
Uncontrolled keywords: | Online research, Cross-border research, Global North, Global South, Gatekeepers, Data protection, Social media-enabled recruitment, Ethical challenges, COVID-19, Transnational |
Subjects: |
G Geography. Anthropology. Recreation > GN Anthropology H Social Sciences R Medicine > RA Public aspects of medicine |
Divisions: | Divisions > Division of Human and Social Sciences > School of Anthropology and Conservation |
Funders: | Organisations -1 not found. |
Depositing User: | Sarah Johns |
Date Deposited: | 08 Sep 2021 12:48 UTC |
Last Modified: | 05 Nov 2024 12:55 UTC |
Resource URI: | https://kar.kent.ac.uk/id/eprint/90080 (The current URI for this page, for reference purposes) |
- Link to SensusAccess
- Export to:
- RefWorks
- EPrints3 XML
- BibTeX
- CSV
- Depositors only (login required):