Mwangi, George Mutugu, Despoudi, Stella, Espindola, Oscar Rodriguez, Spanaki, Konstantina, Papadopoulos, Thanos (2021) Planetary Boundaries Perspective on the Sustainability: Resilience Relationship in the Kenyan Tea Supply Chain. Annals of Operations Research, . ISSN 0254-5330. E-ISSN 1572-9338. (doi:10.1007/s10479-021-04096-y) (KAR id:90006)
PDF
Publisher pdf
Language: English
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
|
|
Download this file (PDF/853kB) |
Preview |
Request a format suitable for use with assistive technology e.g. a screenreader | |
XML Word Processing Document (DOCX)
Author's Accepted Manuscript
Language: English |
|
Download this file (XML Word Processing Document (DOCX)/217kB) |
|
Request a format suitable for use with assistive technology e.g. a screenreader | |
Official URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-021-04096-y |
Abstract
The purpose of this paper is to examine whether agricultural supply chains (ASC) can be simultaneously sustainable and resilient to ecological disruptions, using the Planetary Boundaries theory. The nine different Planetary Boundaries i.e. climatic change, biodiversity loss, biogeochemical, ocean acidification, land use, freshwater availability, stratosphere ozone depletion, atmospheric aerosols and chemical pollution are examined in relation to ASC sustainability and resilience. Kenya’s tea upstream supply chain sustainability and resilience from the ecological point of view is questioned. This study adopts a multi-case study analysis approach of nine producer organisations from Kenya’s tea supply chain. The data from the in-depth semi-structured interviews and a focus group discussion are analysed using thematic analysis. The Kenyan tea supply chain producers are not aware of all the nine planetary boundaries, although these impact on their resilience practices. They are engaged in pursuing both sustainability and resilience practices. They implement mainly environmental practices in relation to sustainability, while only a few of them are implementing resilience practices. The sustainability and resilience concepts were found to be interrelated, but resilience does not improve at the same pace as sustainability. It is suggested that the relationship between sustainability and resilience is non-linear. Limitations and future research avenues are also provided.
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
DOI/Identification number: | 10.1007/s10479-021-04096-y |
Uncontrolled keywords: | planetary boundaries, resilience, sustainability, agriculture, producers |
Divisions: | Divisions > Kent Business School - Division > Department of Analytics, Operations and Systems |
Funders: | University of Kent (https://ror.org/00xkeyj56) |
Depositing User: | Thanos Papadopoulos |
Date Deposited: | 02 Sep 2021 15:48 UTC |
Last Modified: | 05 Nov 2024 12:55 UTC |
Resource URI: | https://kar.kent.ac.uk/id/eprint/90006 (The current URI for this page, for reference purposes) |
- Link to SensusAccess
- Export to:
- RefWorks
- EPrints3 XML
- BibTeX
- CSV
- Depositors only (login required):