Goclowska, Malgorzata A. (2011) The relationship between creativity and cultural diversity: cognitive, motivational and ideological determinants. Doctor of Philosophy (PhD) thesis, University of Kent. (doi:10.22024/UniKent/01.02.86442) (KAR id:86442)
PDF (544062.pdf)
Language: English
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
|
|
Download this file (PDF/7MB) |
Preview |
Official URL: https://doi.org/10.22024/UniKent/01.02.86442 |
Abstract
The argument that diversity enriches society is a common feature in public, political and academic discourse. Recent research has provided some empirical support for this idea with the finding that people who challenge traditional group boundaries (e.g., migrants, women in stereotypically incongruent occupational roles) can experience enhancements to their creative performance. In this thesis I test a new theoretical model, based on social categorization theory, which provides some precise conditions under which the experience of social and cultural diversity will be most beneficial to creative performance. Nine studies yielded support for this model, and the assertion that social and cultural diversity, when experienced in a way that challenges stereotypic expectations, can lead to enhanced creativity. Furthermore, the studies supported the notion that such stereotypically challenging diversity works through a cognitive process of inconsistency resolution that initially decreases, but with repeated engagement enhances, creative performance. The findings of this thesis support calls for further integration of social cognitive and cross-cultural perspectives, and explain why people may be initially resistant to diversity, but how in the longer term the experience can yield considerable benefits for individuals, groups and society at large.
Item Type: | Thesis (Doctor of Philosophy (PhD)) |
---|---|
Thesis advisor: | Crisp, Richard J. |
DOI/Identification number: | 10.22024/UniKent/01.02.86442 |
Additional information: | This thesis has been digitised by EThOS, the British Library digitisation service, for purposes of preservation and dissemination. It was uploaded to KAR on 09 February 2021 in order to hold its content and record within University of Kent systems. It is available Open Access using a Creative Commons Attribution, Non-commercial, No Derivatives (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) licence so that the thesis and its author, can benefit from opportunities for increased readership and citation. This was done in line with University of Kent policies (https://www.kent.ac.uk/is/strategy/docs/Kent%20Open%20Access%20policy.pdf). If you feel that your rights are compromised by open access to this thesis, or if you would like more information about its availability, please contact us at ResearchSupport@kent.ac.uk and we will seriously consider your claim under the terms of our Take-Down Policy (https://www.kent.ac.uk/is/regulations/library/kar-take-down-policy.html). |
Subjects: | B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > BF Psychology |
Divisions: | Divisions > Division of Human and Social Sciences > School of Psychology |
SWORD Depositor: | SWORD Copy |
Depositing User: | SWORD Copy |
Date Deposited: | 29 Oct 2019 17:00 UTC |
Last Modified: | 12 Jan 2022 16:50 UTC |
Resource URI: | https://kar.kent.ac.uk/id/eprint/86442 (The current URI for this page, for reference purposes) |
- Link to SensusAccess
- Export to:
- RefWorks
- EPrints3 XML
- BibTeX
- CSV
- Depositors only (login required):