Skip to main content
Kent Academic Repository

International crisis and peace processes as autopoietic systems in world society: examples from Greek-Turkish relations

Vathakou, Eugenia (2003) International crisis and peace processes as autopoietic systems in world society: examples from Greek-Turkish relations. Doctor of Philosophy (PhD) thesis, University of Kent. (doi:10.22024/UniKent/01.02.86289) (KAR id:86289)

Abstract

The subject of this thesis is the emergence and development of crisis and peace processes in modern society. It examines two Greek-Turkish crises and several peace processes undertaken in their aftermath as well as what is described here as a system of co-operation that emerged after a devastating earthquake in Turkey. Mainstream theory of crisis and peace processes has adopted an instrumental approach to crisis and peace processes conceptualizing them as the means to achieve specific aims. Nevertheless, this approach recognizes the difficulty it has to integrate different levels of analysis and explain the dynamics of the complexity involved in these phenomena. This thesis employs Niklas Luhmann's theory of social autopoiesis as an analytical tool in the research and analysis of crisis and peace processes. Luhmann's theory is a radical constructivist approach, which focuses on multiple causality, complexity and contingency. The main argument of the thesis is that in modern society, which is functionally, not hierarchically, differentiated, crisis and peace processes are autopoietic that is self-reproduced social systems which are constituted through communication. The findings of this thesis demonstrate that crisis and peace processes involve not only segments of the society like leaders and elites but they are selections made by the whole of modern society in the course of its blind evolution which is based on the variation and selection of communication. Society consists of autonomous but interconnected function systems like politics, media, the military and civil society organizations, which operate guided by already established social structures such as expectations, values, social practices, institutions, roles and persons. Social systems increase complexity and contingency in society through their normal operations. Given the appropriate conditioning, increased complexity can enforce the emergence of crisis or peace processes as combined selectivity towards the direction of conflict or co-operation. This thesis demonstrates that in a self-organizing society crisis and peace processes cannot be reduced to a particular reason or rationale like the protection of national interests or the desire for peace. Their dynamics depend on the connectivity and selectivity of communication about crisis/conflict and peace/co-operation. Thus, these processes are neither necessary nor impossible; they are contingent. This thesis demonstrates that Luhmann's theory provides us with sophisticated tools to explore the processes and the mechanisms involved in the emergence and development of crisis and peace processes. The project is based on fieldwork conducted from 1999 to 2002 in both Turkey and Greece and which involved the collection of primary source material gathered from more than 80 interviews with Greek and Turkish politicians, diplomats, journalists, academics, civil society representatives and military officers. It also covers an extensive range of theoretical and empirical secondary source literature.

Item Type: Thesis (Doctor of Philosophy (PhD))
Thesis advisor: Rossbach, Stefan
DOI/Identification number: 10.22024/UniKent/01.02.86289
Additional information: This thesis has been digitised by EThOS, the British Library digitisation service, for purposes of preservation and dissemination. It was uploaded to KAR on 09 February 2021 in order to hold its content and record within University of Kent systems. It is available Open Access using a Creative Commons Attribution, Non-commercial, No Derivatives (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) licence so that the thesis and its author, can benefit from opportunities for increased readership and citation. This was done in line with University of Kent policies (https://www.kent.ac.uk/is/strategy/docs/Kent%20Open%20Access%20policy.pdf). If you feel that your rights are compromised by open access to this thesis, or if you would like more information about its availability, please contact us at ResearchSupport@kent.ac.uk and we will seriously consider your claim under the terms of our Take-Down Policy (https://www.kent.ac.uk/is/regulations/library/kar-take-down-policy.html).
Subjects: J Political Science
Divisions: Divisions > Division of Human and Social Sciences > School of Politics and International Relations
SWORD Depositor: SWORD Copy
Depositing User: SWORD Copy
Date Deposited: 29 Oct 2019 16:48 UTC
Last Modified: 09 Dec 2022 12:21 UTC
Resource URI: https://kar.kent.ac.uk/id/eprint/86289 (The current URI for this page, for reference purposes)

University of Kent Author Information

  • Depositors only (login required):

Total unique views for this document in KAR since July 2020. For more details click on the image.