Pyke, Wesley, Vostanis, Athanasios, Javadi, Amir-Homayoun (2020) Electrical Brain Stimulation During a Retrieval-Based Learning Task Can Impair Long-Term Memory. Journal of Cognitive Enhancement, 5 . pp. 218-232. ISSN 2509-3290. E-ISSN 2509-3304. (doi:10.1007/s41465-020-00200-5) (KAR id:84517)
PDF
Publisher pdf
Language: English
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
|
|
Download this file (PDF/1MB) |
Preview |
Request a format suitable for use with assistive technology e.g. a screenreader | |
Official URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41465-020-00200-5 |
Abstract
Anodal transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) to the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) has been shown to improve performance on a multitude of cognitive tasks. These are, however, often simple tasks, testing only one cognitive domain at a time. Therefore, the efficacy of brain stimulation for complex tasks has yet to be understood. Using a task designed to increase learning efficiency, this study investigates whether anodal tDCS over the left DLPFC can modulate both learning ability and subsequent long-term memory retention. Using a within-subject design, participants (N = 25) took part in 6 training sessions over consecutive days in which active or sham stimulation was administered randomly (3 of each). A computer-based task was used, containing flags from countries unknown to the participants. Each training session consisted of the repetition of 8 pairs of flag/country names. Subsequently, in three testing sessions, free, cued, and timed cued recall, participants were assessed on all 48 flags they had learnt. No difference in learning speed between active and sham tDCS was found. Furthermore, in the timed cued recall phase, flags learnt in the sham tDCS sessions were recalled significantly better than flags learnt in the active tDCS sessions. This effect was stronger in the second testing session. It was also found that for the flags answered incorrectly; thus, meaning they were presented more frequently, subsequent long-term retention was improved. These results suggest that for a complex task, anodal tDCS is ineffective at improving learning speed and potentially detrimental to long-term retention when employed during encoding. This serves to highlight the complex nature of brain stimulation, providing a greater understanding of its limitations and drawbacks.
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
DOI/Identification number: | 10.1007/s41465-020-00200-5 |
Uncontrolled keywords: | Memory impairment, Long-term memory, Anodal stimulation, Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), Transcranial electrical brain stimulation (tES), Retrieval-based learning, Dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) |
Subjects: | B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > BF Psychology |
Divisions: |
Divisions > Division of Human and Social Sciences > School of Psychology Divisions > Division for the Study of Law, Society and Social Justice > School of Social Policy, Sociology and Social Research > Tizard |
Depositing User: | Thanos Vostanis |
Date Deposited: | 27 Nov 2020 20:11 UTC |
Last Modified: | 05 Nov 2024 12:50 UTC |
Resource URI: | https://kar.kent.ac.uk/id/eprint/84517 (The current URI for this page, for reference purposes) |
- Link to SensusAccess
- Export to:
- RefWorks
- EPrints3 XML
- BibTeX
- CSV
- Depositors only (login required):