Ellavarason, Elakkiya, Guest, Richard, Deravi, Farzin (2020) Evaluation of stability of swipe gesture authentication across usage scenarios of mobile device. EURASIP Journal on Information Security, . ISSN 2510-523X. E-ISSN 1687-417X. (doi:10.1186/s13635-020-00103-0) (KAR id:80719)
|
PDF
Publisher pdf
Language: English
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
|
|
|
Download this file (PDF/2MB) |
Preview |
| Request a format suitable for use with assistive technology e.g. a screenreader | |
| Official URL: https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13635-020-00103-0 |
|
Abstract
Background: User interaction with a mobile device predominantly consists of touch motions, otherwise known as swipe gestures, which are used as a behavioural biometric modality to verify the identity of a user. Literature reveals promising verification accuracy rates for swipe gesture authentication. Most of the existing studies have considered constrained environment in their experimental set-up. However, real-life usage of a mobile device consists of several unconstrained scenarios as well. Thus, our work aims to evaluate the stability of swipe gesture authentication across various usage scenarios of a mobile device. Methods: The evaluations were performed using state-of-the-art touch-based classification algorithms—support vector machine (SVM), k-nearest neighbour (kNN) and naive Bayes—to evaluate the robustness of swipe gestures across device usage scenarios. To simulate real-life behaviour, multiple usage scenarios covering stationary and dynamic modes are considered for the analysis. Additionally, we focused on analysing the stability of verification accuracy for time-separated swipes by performing intra-session (acquired on the same day) and inter-session (swipes acquired a week later) comparisons. Finally, we assessed the consistency of individual features for horizontal and vertical swipes using a statistical method. Results: Performance evaluation results indicate impact of body movement and environment (indoor and outdoor) on the user verification accuracy. The results reveal that for a static user scenario, the average equal error rate is 1%, and it rises significantly for the scenarios involving any body movement—caused either by user or the environment. The performance evaluation for time-separated swipes showed better verification accuracy rate for swipes acquired on the same day compared to swipes separated by a week. Finally, assessment on feature consistency reveal a set of consistent features such as maximum slope, standard deviation and mean velocity of second half of stroke for both horizontal and vertical swipes.
Conclusions: The performance evaluation of swipe-based authentication shows variation in verification accuracy across different device usage scenarios. The obtained results challenge the adoption of swipe-based authentication on mobile devices. We have suggested ways to further achieve stability through specific template selection strategies. Additionally, our evaluation has established that at least 6 swipes are needed in enrolment to achieve acceptable accuracy. Also, our results conclude that features such as maximum slope and standard deviation are the most consistent features across scenarios.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| DOI/Identification number: | 10.1186/s13635-020-00103-0 |
| Uncontrolled keywords: | Mobile biometrics, Swipe, Behavioural biometrics |
| Subjects: | T Technology |
| Institutional Unit: | Schools > School of Engineering, Mathematics and Physics > Engineering |
| Former Institutional Unit: |
Divisions > Division of Computing, Engineering and Mathematical Sciences > School of Engineering and Digital Arts
|
| Depositing User: | Farzin Deravi |
| Date Deposited: | 03 Apr 2020 15:45 UTC |
| Last Modified: | 22 Jul 2025 09:01 UTC |
| Resource URI: | https://kar.kent.ac.uk/id/eprint/80719 (The current URI for this page, for reference purposes) |
- Link to SensusAccess
- Export to:
- RefWorks
- EPrints3 XML
- BibTeX
- CSV
- Depositors only (login required):

https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7535-7336
Altmetric
Altmetric