Jeyacheya, Julia, Hampton, Mark P. (2020) Wishful thinking or wise policy? Theorising tourism-led inclusive growth: supply chains and host communities. World Development, 131 . Article Number 104960. ISSN 0305-750X. (doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2020.104960) (KAR id:80554)
PDF
Author's Accepted Manuscript
Language: English
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
|
|
Download this file (PDF/444kB) |
Preview |
Request a format suitable for use with assistive technology e.g. a screenreader | |
Official URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2020.104960 |
Abstract
Tourism is perceived as driving economic growth for developing countries by generating employment, income and government revenue. In debates over the relationship between economic growth and poverty alleviation, the inclusive growth paradigm emerged in World Bank, OECD and other development publications, becoming a UN Sustainable Development Goal (SDG 8). However, inclusive growth remains highly contested, and specifically, tourism’s role in economic growth has been little discussed. This paper contributes to the debate by interrogating tourism-led inclusive growth using evidence from developing economies in South-East Asia, a region with booming international tourism. It raises the fundamental question whether tourism-led growth can be inclusive in the short- to medium-term, drawing on evidence from fieldwork in Malaysia, Vietnam, Indonesia and Myanmar. Fieldwork utilised a rapid rural appraisal approach using qualitative methods, mainly semi-structured interviews. Although tourism can generate employment overall, this can be precarious and poorly paid, limiting opportunities for poverty alleviation. Tourism-led growth may widen inequalities in host communities and weaken backward linkages to the local economy, despite its potential for strengthening such linkages to food and non-food sectors. Remoteness and transportation also weaken such linkages. Low-income households and locally owned businesses are most affected by the construction of large-scale tourism projects – which although increasing overall tourist arrivals and expenditure - can result in the loss of land, business premises and livelihoods. In addition, privileging large capital, foreign firms and crony conglomerates is a regional trend and a major obstacle for tourism-led inclusive growth policy. Ownership patterns and destination governance also play critical roles in defining a destination’s direction/pace of development, steering it towards or away from tourism-led inclusive growth. Given tourism’s significance for many developing countries, the paper contributes to wider debates over inclusive growth both for theorising, and in its policy relevance for national development strategies and poverty alleviation.
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
DOI/Identification number: | 10.1016/j.worlddev.2020.104960 |
Uncontrolled keywords: | inclusive growth; tourism development; poverty alleviation; economic linkages; South-East Asia |
Subjects: |
G Geography. Anthropology. Recreation > GV Recreation. Leisure H Social Sciences > HB Economic Theory H Social Sciences > HD Industries. Land use. Labor J Political Science > JQ Political institutions and public administrations (Asia, Africa, Australia, Pacific Area, etc.) |
Divisions: |
Divisions > Division of Human and Social Sciences > School of Anthropology and Conservation Divisions > Kent Business School - Division > Department of Leadership and Management |
Depositing User: | Mark Hampton |
Date Deposited: | 19 Mar 2020 13:54 UTC |
Last Modified: | 05 Nov 2024 12:46 UTC |
Resource URI: | https://kar.kent.ac.uk/id/eprint/80554 (The current URI for this page, for reference purposes) |
- Link to SensusAccess
- Export to:
- RefWorks
- EPrints3 XML
- BibTeX
- CSV
- Depositors only (login required):