Rackley, Erika (2010) In conversation with Lord Justice Etherton : revisiting the case for a more diverse judiciary. Public Law, 2010 (4). pp. 655-662. ISSN 0033-3565. (The full text of this publication is not currently available from this repository. You may be able to access a copy if URLs are provided) (KAR id:76558)
| The full text of this publication is not currently available from this repository. You may be able to access a copy if URLs are provided. | |
| Official URL: https://www.sweetandmaxwell.co.uk/Catalogue/Produc... |
|
| Additional URLs: |
|
Abstract
Discusses the debate over the need for a greater judicial diversity of experiences, referring to suggestions by Lord Justice Etherton. Outlines the three main arguments for such an increase in judicial diversity, namely those relating to the democratic legitimacy of the judiciary, arguments for equity and social justice, and notions of "difference" or perspective. Notes arguments surrounding the role of women in the judiciary. Considers the view that certain characteristics such as candidates' sex or ethnicity are irrelevant in comparison to the need for judges to be competent and achieve their position through individual merit.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled keywords: | Diversity, Judiciary, Women |
| Subjects: | K Law |
| Institutional Unit: | Schools > Kent Law School |
| Former Institutional Unit: |
Divisions > Division for the Study of Law, Society and Social Justice > Kent Law School
|
| Depositing User: | Sian Robertson |
| Date Deposited: | 25 Sep 2019 15:11 UTC |
| Last Modified: | 20 May 2025 13:40 UTC |
| Resource URI: | https://kar.kent.ac.uk/id/eprint/76558 (The current URI for this page, for reference purposes) |
- Export to:
- RefWorks
- EPrints3 XML
- BibTeX
- CSV
- Depositors only (login required):

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4566-7007
Total Views
Total Views