McGlynn, C., Rackley, Erika (2007) Striking a balance: Arguments for the criminal regulation of extreme pornography. Criminal Law Review, 2007 (Sep.). pp. 677-690. ISSN 0011-135X. (The full text of this publication is not currently available from this repository. You may be able to access a copy if URLs are provided) (KAR id:76551)
| The full text of this publication is not currently available from this repository. You may be able to access a copy if URLs are provided. |
Abstract
This article examines the government's proposals to criminalise the possession of extreme pornography. Drawing on the diverse responses to the government's 2005 Consultation Paper, it argues that the "categories" approach to regulating pornography, underpinned by a focus on "harm to women", is preferable to the traditional morality-based obscenity standard found in the Obscene Publications Act 1959.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Subjects: | K Law |
| Divisions: | Divisions > Division for the Study of Law, Society and Social Justice > Kent Law School |
| Depositing User: | Sian Robertson |
| Date Deposited: | 25 Sep 2019 14:25 UTC |
| Last Modified: | 16 Nov 2021 10:26 UTC |
| Resource URI: | https://kar.kent.ac.uk/id/eprint/76551 (The current URI for this page, for reference purposes) |
University of Kent Author Information
Rackley, Erika.
| Creator's ORCID: |
 https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4566-7007
|
|---|---|
| CReDIT Contributor Roles: |
- Export to:
- RefWorks
- EPrints3 XML
- BibTeX
- CSV
- Depositors only (login required):
Download Statistics
Download Statistics
