Skip to main content
Kent Academic Repository

How many migrants are people willing to welcome into their country? The effect of numerical anchoring on migrants’ acceptance

Lalot, Fanny, Quiamzade, Alain, Falomir‐Pichastor, Juan M. (2019) How many migrants are people willing to welcome into their country? The effect of numerical anchoring on migrants’ acceptance. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 49 (6). pp. 361-371. ISSN 0021-9029. (doi:10.1111/jasp.12588) (KAR id:76094)

PDF Publisher pdf
Language: English

Restricted to Repository staff only
Contact us about this Publication
[thumbnail of Lalot Quiamzade & Falomir_2019_numerical anchoring migrants acceptance JASP.pdf]
PDF Author's Accepted Manuscript
Language: English
Download this file
(PDF/644kB)
[thumbnail of Lalot Quiamzade & Falomir_2019_authorcopy_numerical anchoring migrants acceptance.pdf]
Preview
Request a format suitable for use with assistive technology e.g. a screenreader
Official URL:
https://doi.org/10.1111/jasp.12588

Abstract

How many migrants are people willing to welcome into their country? Relying on a classical anchoring paradigm, we investigated the effect of numerical anchors reported in communication media echoing political positions regarding how many migrants should be accepted in one country. Four studies (N = 601) tested the effect of a numerical anchor within a politician’s statement on the number of migrants that people think should be accepted in their home country. Across studies, we found a strong anchor effect (average Cohen’s d = 1.40, 95% CI [1.18, 1.63]): participants were willing to accept a higher (vs. lower) number of migrants following a high (vs. low) anchor. Importantly, the effect occurred among both left wing‐ and right wing oriented participants, although being slightly smaller among the latter (Study 3). Moreover, it was independent from the political party serving as the source for the anchors as well as participants’ attitude toward these political parties (Study 4). Relevance of the present findings for persuasion and political decision‐making literature is discussed.

Item Type: Article
DOI/Identification number: 10.1111/jasp.12588
Subjects: B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > BF Psychology
Divisions: Divisions > Division of Human and Social Sciences > School of Psychology
Depositing User: Fanny Lalot
Date Deposited: 03 Sep 2019 09:31 UTC
Last Modified: 05 Nov 2024 12:40 UTC
Resource URI: https://kar.kent.ac.uk/id/eprint/76094 (The current URI for this page, for reference purposes)

University of Kent Author Information

  • Depositors only (login required):

Total unique views for this document in KAR since July 2020. For more details click on the image.