Bovensiepen, Judith M., Pelkmans, Mathijs (2020) Dynamics of wilful blindness: An introduction. Critique of Anthropology, 40 (4). pp. 387-402. ISSN 0308-275X. E-ISSN 1460-3721. (doi:10.1177/0308275X20959432) (KAR id:75613)
PDF
Publisher pdf
Language: English
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
|
|
Download this file (PDF/314kB) |
Preview |
Request a format suitable for use with assistive technology e.g. a screenreader | |
PDF
Author's Accepted Manuscript
Language: English |
|
Download this file (PDF/863kB) |
Preview |
Request a format suitable for use with assistive technology e.g. a screenreader | |
XML Word Processing Document (DOCX)
Author's Accepted Manuscript
Language: English Restricted to Repository staff only |
|
Contact us about this Publication
|
|
PDF (Letter of acceptance)
Additional Metadata
Language: English Restricted to Repository staff only |
|
Contact us about this Publication
|
|
XML Word Processing Document (DOCX) (Non-copy edited version)
Author's Accepted Manuscript
Language: English Restricted to Repository staff only |
|
Contact us about this Publication
|
|
Official URL: https://doi.org/10.1177/0308275X20959432 |
Abstract
What are the politics of ignorance in an age of misinformation? How can the concept of ‘wilful blindness’ help us to understand the logics involved? We start the introduction to this special issue by arguing that the intrinsic instability of wilful blindness draws valuable attention to the graded nature of intentionality and perception, and the tensions between them. These features are an essential part of the workings of ignorance, as we illustrate with reference to the shifting intentions of drug couriers, the fleeting moments in which the humanity of victims is recognised in the midst of violent acts, and the affects that channel economic behaviour, such as in the subprime mortgage crisis. When approaching perception and intentionality as complexly entangled in institutionalised fields of power, ‘wilful blindness’ emerges as a powerful and critical diagnostic of the epistemic instabilities of our time.
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
DOI/Identification number: | 10.1177/0308275X20959432 |
Uncontrolled keywords: | Affect, agnotology, denial, intentionality, political economy of non-knowledge, recognition, strategic ignorance, transparency |
Subjects: | G Geography. Anthropology. Recreation |
Divisions: | Divisions > Division of Human and Social Sciences > School of Anthropology and Conservation |
Depositing User: | Judith Bovensiepen |
Date Deposited: | 30 Jul 2019 08:30 UTC |
Last Modified: | 05 Nov 2024 12:40 UTC |
Resource URI: | https://kar.kent.ac.uk/id/eprint/75613 (The current URI for this page, for reference purposes) |
- Link to SensusAccess
- Export to:
- RefWorks
- EPrints3 XML
- BibTeX
- CSV
- Depositors only (login required):