Skip to main content
Kent Academic Repository

Is policy ‘liberalization’ associated with higher odds of adolescent cannabis use? A re-analysis of data from 38 countries

Stevens, Alex (2019) Is policy ‘liberalization’ associated with higher odds of adolescent cannabis use? A re-analysis of data from 38 countries. International Journal of Drug Policy, 66 . pp. 94-99. ISSN 0955-3959. (doi:10.1016/j.drugpo.2019.01.013) (KAR id:72331)

Abstract

Background: Policy makers worldwide face the choice of whether to reform cannabis

policy from the ‘full prohibition’ model. A paper by Shi, Lenzi and An (2015)

suggested that such ‘liberalization’ is significantly associated with higher odds of

adolescent cannabis use.

Aim: To test the validity and reliability of Shi et al’s conclusion that the HBSC data

show an association between policy ‘liberalization’ and increased likelihood of

adolescent cannabis use.

Methods: Replication and re-analysis of the same pooled data from three waves of

the Health Behaviour in School-aged Children (HBSC) survey (2001/2, 2005/6 and

2009/10). This replicates – as far as possible – the coding and analytical strategy of

the Shi et al article. The re-analysis makes some improvements by: excluding a

variable (‘number of siblings’) for which many cases have missing data; including

available data from the theoretically relevant case of Sweden for the latter two waves

of the HBSC survey, which Shi et al omit; and including random slopes for gender

between countries as well as random intercepts for countries in the mixed effects

model, as the predictive effect of gender on cannabis use varies across countries.

Results: Shi et al’s verbal summary of their findings is not supported by detailed

interpretation of their own numerical results. Without making the suggested

amendments, it is possible to find a statistically significant association between

policy ‘liberalization’ and higher odds of some measures of adolescent cannabis use.

But when these improvements are made, this association becomes statistically nonsignificant.

Conclusion: Using a larger and more theoretically relevant sample of the HBSC

respondents and an improved statistical model shows that the HBSC data do not

reveal a statistically significant association between policy ‘liberalization’ and higher

odds of adolescent cannabis use.

Item Type: Article
DOI/Identification number: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2019.01.013
Uncontrolled keywords: Cannabis; policy; youth; adolescence; HBSC; multilevel regression; replication; open science
Subjects: H Social Sciences
Divisions: Divisions > Division for the Study of Law, Society and Social Justice > School of Social Policy, Sociology and Social Research
Depositing User: Alex Stevens
Date Deposited: 11 Feb 2019 13:54 UTC
Last Modified: 28 Jul 2022 22:09 UTC
Resource URI: https://kar.kent.ac.uk/id/eprint/72331 (The current URI for this page, for reference purposes)

University of Kent Author Information

  • Depositors only (login required):

Total unique views for this document in KAR since July 2020. For more details click on the image.