Stevens, Alex (2019) Is policy ‘liberalization’ associated with higher odds of adolescent cannabis use? A re-analysis of data from 38 countries. International Journal of Drug Policy, 66 . pp. 94-99. ISSN 0955-3959. (doi:10.1016/j.drugpo.2019.01.013) (KAR id:72331)
PDF
Author's Accepted Manuscript
Language: English
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
|
|
Download this file (PDF/1MB) |
|
Request a format suitable for use with assistive technology e.g. a screenreader | |
Official URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugpo.2019.01.013 |
Abstract
Background: Policy makers worldwide face the choice of whether to reform cannabis
policy from the ‘full prohibition’ model. A paper by Shi, Lenzi and An (2015)
suggested that such ‘liberalization’ is significantly associated with higher odds of
adolescent cannabis use.
Aim: To test the validity and reliability of Shi et al’s conclusion that the HBSC data
show an association between policy ‘liberalization’ and increased likelihood of
adolescent cannabis use.
Methods: Replication and re-analysis of the same pooled data from three waves of
the Health Behaviour in School-aged Children (HBSC) survey (2001/2, 2005/6 and
2009/10). This replicates – as far as possible – the coding and analytical strategy of
the Shi et al article. The re-analysis makes some improvements by: excluding a
variable (‘number of siblings’) for which many cases have missing data; including
available data from the theoretically relevant case of Sweden for the latter two waves
of the HBSC survey, which Shi et al omit; and including random slopes for gender
between countries as well as random intercepts for countries in the mixed effects
model, as the predictive effect of gender on cannabis use varies across countries.
Results: Shi et al’s verbal summary of their findings is not supported by detailed
interpretation of their own numerical results. Without making the suggested
amendments, it is possible to find a statistically significant association between
policy ‘liberalization’ and higher odds of some measures of adolescent cannabis use.
But when these improvements are made, this association becomes statistically nonsignificant.
Conclusion: Using a larger and more theoretically relevant sample of the HBSC
respondents and an improved statistical model shows that the HBSC data do not
reveal a statistically significant association between policy ‘liberalization’ and higher
odds of adolescent cannabis use.
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
DOI/Identification number: | 10.1016/j.drugpo.2019.01.013 |
Uncontrolled keywords: | Cannabis; policy; youth; adolescence; HBSC; multilevel regression; replication; open science |
Subjects: | H Social Sciences |
Divisions: | Divisions > Division for the Study of Law, Society and Social Justice > School of Social Policy, Sociology and Social Research |
Depositing User: | Alex Stevens |
Date Deposited: | 11 Feb 2019 13:54 UTC |
Last Modified: | 05 Nov 2024 12:34 UTC |
Resource URI: | https://kar.kent.ac.uk/id/eprint/72331 (The current URI for this page, for reference purposes) |
- Link to SensusAccess
- Export to:
- RefWorks
- EPrints3 XML
- BibTeX
- CSV
- Depositors only (login required):