Freitas, Alex A., Pinto Junior, Jony A., Plastino, Alexandre, Neumann, Nadine M. (2018) Is P-value<0.05 Enough? Two Case Studies in Classifiers Evaluation. In: Annals of the National Meeting of Artificial and Computational Intelligence (ENIAC). . pp. 94-103. (doi:10.5753/eniac.2018.4407) (KAR id:72111)
PDF
Publisher pdf
Language: English |
|
Download this file (PDF/253kB) |
Preview |
Request a format suitable for use with assistive technology e.g. a screenreader | |
Official URL: https://doi.org/10.5753/eniac.2018.4407 |
Abstract
A common tool used in the process of comparing classifiers is
the statistical significance analysis, performed through the hypothesis test.
However, there are many researchers attempting to obtain statistical significance through a blinding evaluating of the p-value<0.05 condition, ignoring
important concepts such as the effect size and statistical power. This work
highlights possible problems caused by the misuse of the hypothesis test and
how the effect size and the statistical power can provide information for
a better decision making. Therefore, two case studies applying Student’s
t-test and Wilcoxon signed-rank test for the comparison of two classifiers
are presented.
Item Type: | Conference or workshop item (Proceeding) |
---|---|
DOI/Identification number: | 10.5753/eniac.2018.4407 |
Divisions: | Divisions > Division of Computing, Engineering and Mathematical Sciences > School of Computing |
Depositing User: | Alex Freitas |
Date Deposited: | 01 Feb 2019 13:05 UTC |
Last Modified: | 05 Nov 2024 12:34 UTC |
Resource URI: | https://kar.kent.ac.uk/id/eprint/72111 (The current URI for this page, for reference purposes) |
- Link to SensusAccess
- Export to:
- RefWorks
- EPrints3 XML
- BibTeX
- CSV
- Depositors only (login required):