Larger gains from improved management over sparing–sharing for tropical forests

Runting, Rebecca K., Ruslandi, Ruslandi, Griscom, Bronson W., Struebig, Matthew J., Satar, Musnanda, Meijaard, Erik, Burivalova, Zuzuna, Cheyne, Susan M., Deere, Nicolas J., Game, Edward T., and others. (2019) Larger gains from improved management over sparing–sharing for tropical forests. Nature Sustainability, 2 . pp. 53-61. ISSN 2398-9629. (doi:10.1038/s41893-018-0203-0) (KAR id:70188)

PDF Author's Accepted Manuscript Language: English
Download this file (PDF/1MB)	Preview
Request a format suitable for use with assistive technology e.g. a screenreader
PDF Publisher pdf Language: English Restricted to Repository staff only
Contact us about this Publication
Microsoft Word (Version accepted pending editorial changes) Author's Accepted Manuscript Language: English Restricted to Repository staff only
Contact us about this Publication
Official URL: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-018-0203-0

Abstract

Tropical forests are globally significant for both biodiversity conservation and the production of economically valuable wood products. Two contrasting approaches have been suggested to simultaneously produce timber and conserve biodiversity; one partitions forests to deliver these objectives separately (sparing), the other integrates both objectives in the same location (sharing). To date, the ‘sparing or sharing’ debate has focused on agricultural landscapes, with scant attention paid to forest management. Here we explored the sparing-to-sharing continuum through spatial optimisations with set economic returns for the forests of East Kalimantan, Indonesia – a global biodiversity hotspot. We found that neither sparing nor sharing extremes are optimal, although the greatest conservation value was attained towards the sparing end of the continuum. Critically, improved management strategies, such as reduced-impact logging, accounted for larger conservation gains than altering the balance between sparing and sharing, particularly for endangered species. Ultimately, debating sparing versus sharing has limited value while large gains remain from improving forest management.

Item Type:	Article
DOI/Identification number:	10.1038/s41893-018-0203-0
Uncontrolled keywords:	Biodiversity; Conservation biology; Environmental economics; Forestry
Subjects:	Q Science > QH Natural history > QH75 Conservation (Biology)
Divisions:	Divisions > Division of Human and Social Sciences > School of Anthropology and Conservation > DICE (Durrell Institute of Conservation and Ecology)
Depositing User:	Matthew Struebig
Date Deposited:	11 Jan 2019 10:26 UTC
Last Modified:	05 Nov 2024 12:32 UTC
Resource URI:	https://kar.kent.ac.uk/id/eprint/70188 (The current URI for this page, for reference purposes)

University of Kent Author Information

Struebig, Matthew J..

Creator's ORCID:	https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2058-8502
CReDIT Contributor Roles:

Deere, Nicolas J..

Creator's ORCID:	https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1299-2126
CReDIT Contributor Roles:

Depositors only (login required):

Altmetric

Download Statistics

Total unique views for this document in KAR since July 2020. For more details click on the image.