Chung, Heejung (2020) Gender, flexibility stigma, and the perceived negative consequences of flexible working in the UK. Social Indicators Research, 151 (2). pp. 521-545. ISSN 0303-8300. (doi:10.1007/s11205-018-2036-7) (KAR id:70102)
PDF
Publisher pdf
Language: English
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
|
|
Download this file (PDF/871kB) |
Preview |
Request a format suitable for use with assistive technology e.g. a screenreader | |
PDF
Author's Accepted Manuscript
Language: English |
|
Download this file (PDF/998kB) |
Preview |
Request a format suitable for use with assistive technology e.g. a screenreader | |
Official URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-018-2036-7 |
Abstract
This study examines the prevalence and the gender differences in the perceptions and experiences of
flexibility stigma – i.e., the belief that workers who use flexible working arrangements for care
purposes are less productive and less committed to the workplace. This is done by using the 4th wave
of the Work-Life Balance Survey conducted in 2011 in the UK. The results show that 35% of all
workers agree to the statement that those who work flexibly generate more work for others and 32%
believe that those who work flexibly have lower chances for promotion. Men are more likely to agree
to the former, while women especially mothers are more likely to agree to the latter. Similarly, men
are more likely to say they experienced negative outcomes due to co-workers working flexibly, while
again mothers are more likely to say they experienced negative career consequences due to their own
flexible working. The use of working time reducing arrangements such as part-time is a major reason
why people experience negative career outcomes, and can partially explain why mothers are more
likely to suffer from such outcomes when working flexibly. However, this relationship could be
reverse, namely, the stigma towards part-time workers may be due to negative perceptions society
hold towards mothers’ commitment to work and their productivity. In sum, this paper shows that
flexibility stigma is gendered, in that men are more likely to discriminate against flexible workers,
while women, especially mothers, are more likely to suffer from such discrimination.
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
DOI/Identification number: | 10.1007/s11205-018-2036-7 |
Uncontrolled keywords: | Flexible working, Flexibility stigma, career consequences, UK, gender inequality, gender, parental status |
Subjects: |
H Social Sciences H Social Sciences > HQ The family. Marriage. Women > HQ1236 Women and the state. Women's rights. Women's political activity |
Divisions: | Divisions > Division for the Study of Law, Society and Social Justice > School of Social Policy, Sociology and Social Research |
Depositing User: | Heejung Chung |
Date Deposited: | 15 Nov 2018 12:45 UTC |
Last Modified: | 05 Nov 2024 12:32 UTC |
Resource URI: | https://kar.kent.ac.uk/id/eprint/70102 (The current URI for this page, for reference purposes) |
- Link to SensusAccess
- Export to:
- RefWorks
- EPrints3 XML
- BibTeX
- CSV
- Depositors only (login required):