Clark, Andrew E. (2017) Happiness, income and poverty. International Review of Economics, 64 (2). pp. 145-158. ISSN 1865-1704. (doi:10.1007/s12232-017-0274-7) (The full text of this publication is not currently available from this repository. You may be able to access a copy if URLs are provided) (KAR id:69175)
The full text of this publication is not currently available from this repository. You may be able to access a copy if URLs are provided. (Contact us about this Publication) | |
Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12232-017-0274-7 |
Abstract
There is considerable evidence from a variety of sources to suggest that well-being is a function of relative income. These findings have been used to explain the Easterlin Paradox, whereby a rise in income for all does not lead to a rise in average happiness in a country (even though the cross section relationship between income and happiness is positive). This relativity of utility has led to calls for policy to focus away from GDP. I here first discuss some of the evidence that well-being is indeed relative in income, but then consider two relatively little-analysed issues to suggest that there may continue to be a role for GDP per capita in happiness-based policy: the inequality of subjective well-being, and the specific case of those in income poverty.
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
DOI/Identification number: | 10.1007/s12232-017-0274-7 |
Uncontrolled keywords: | Happiness; Income; Inequality; Poverty |
Subjects: | H Social Sciences |
Divisions: | Divisions > Kent Business School - Division > Department of Leadership and Management |
Depositing User: | Andrew Clark |
Date Deposited: | 21 Sep 2018 10:23 UTC |
Last Modified: | 05 Nov 2024 12:31 UTC |
Resource URI: | https://kar.kent.ac.uk/id/eprint/69175 (The current URI for this page, for reference purposes) |
- Export to:
- RefWorks
- EPrints3 XML
- BibTeX
- CSV
- Depositors only (login required):