Skip to main content

Three Strong Moves to Improve Research and Replications Alike

Giner-Sorolla, Roger, Amodio, David M., van Kleef, Gerben (2018) Three Strong Moves to Improve Research and Replications Alike. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 41 . Article Number 130. ISSN 0140-525X. E-ISSN 1469-1825. (doi:10.1017/S0140525X18000651) (KAR id:66771)

PDF Author's Accepted Manuscript
Language: English
Download (128kB) Preview
Microsoft Word Author's Accepted Manuscript
Language: English

Restricted to Repository staff only
Contact us about this Publication
Official URL
https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X18000651

Abstract

We suggest three additional improvements to replication practices. First, original research should include concrete checks on validity, encouraged by editorial standards. Second, the reasons for replicating a particular study should be more transparent, and balance systematic positive reasons with selective negative ones. Third, methodological validity should also be factored into evaluating replications, with methodologically inconclusive replications not counted as non-replications.

Item Type: Article
DOI/Identification number: 10.1017/S0140525X18000651
Uncontrolled keywords: replication, methodology, psychology, publishing
Subjects: B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > BF Psychology
Divisions: Faculties > Social Sciences > School of Psychology
Depositing User: Roger Giner-Sorolla
Date Deposited: 17 Apr 2018 15:04 UTC
Last Modified: 17 Sep 2020 15:54 UTC
Resource URI: https://kar.kent.ac.uk/id/eprint/66771 (The current URI for this page, for reference purposes)
Giner-Sorolla, Roger: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6690-8842
  • Depositors only (login required):