Three Strong Moves to Improve Research and Replications Alike

Giner-Sorolla, Roger and Amodio, David M. and van Kleef, Gerben (2018) Three Strong Moves to Improve Research and Replications Alike. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 41 . e130. ISSN 0140-525X. E-ISSN 1469-1825. (doi:https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X18000651) (Access to this publication is currently restricted. You may be able to access a copy if URLs are provided)

PDF - Author's Accepted Manuscript
Download (128kB) Preview
[img]
Preview
MS Word - Author's Accepted Manuscript
Restricted to Repository staff only
Contact us about this Publication Download (35kB)
[img]
Official URL
https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X18000651

Abstract

We suggest three additional improvements to replication practices. First, original research should include concrete checks on validity, encouraged by editorial standards. Second, the reasons for replicating a particular study should be more transparent, and balance systematic positive reasons with selective negative ones. Third, methodological validity should also be factored into evaluating replications, with methodologically inconclusive replications not counted as non-replications.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled keywords: replication, methodology, psychology, publishing
Subjects: B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > BF Psychology
Divisions: Faculties > Social Sciences > School of Psychology
Depositing User: Roger Giner-Sorolla
Date Deposited: 17 Apr 2018 15:04 UTC
Last Modified: 27 Jan 2019 00:00 UTC
Resource URI: https://kar.kent.ac.uk/id/eprint/66771 (The current URI for this page, for reference purposes)
  • Depositors only (login required):

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year