Three Strong Moves to Improve Research and Replications Alike

Giner-Sorolla, Roger, Amodio, David M., van Kleef, Gerben (2018) Three Strong Moves to Improve Research and Replications Alike. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 41 . Article Number 130. ISSN 0140-525X. E-ISSN 1469-1825. (doi:10.1017/S0140525X18000651) (KAR id:66771)

PDF Author's Accepted Manuscript Language: English
Download this file (PDF/205kB)	Preview
Request a format suitable for use with assistive technology e.g. a screenreader
Microsoft Word Author's Accepted Manuscript Language: English Restricted to Repository staff only
Contact us about this Publication
Official URL: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X18000651

Abstract

We suggest three additional improvements to replication practices. First, original research should include concrete checks on validity, encouraged by editorial standards. Second, the reasons for replicating a particular study should be more transparent, and balance systematic positive reasons with selective negative ones. Third, methodological validity should also be factored into evaluating replications, with methodologically inconclusive replications not counted as non-replications.

Item Type:	Article
DOI/Identification number:	10.1017/S0140525X18000651
Uncontrolled keywords:	replication, methodology, psychology, publishing
Subjects:	B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > BF Psychology
Divisions:	Divisions > Division of Human and Social Sciences > School of Psychology
Depositing User:	Roger Giner-Sorolla
Date Deposited:	17 Apr 2018 15:04 UTC
Last Modified:	05 Nov 2024 11:06 UTC
Resource URI:	https://kar.kent.ac.uk/id/eprint/66771 (The current URI for this page, for reference purposes)

University of Kent Author Information

Giner-Sorolla, Roger.

Creator's ORCID:	https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6690-8842
CReDIT Contributor Roles:

Depositors only (login required):

Altmetric

Download Statistics

Total unique views for this document in KAR since July 2020. For more details click on the image.